## The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Face of the Earth as Seen from the Air

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: The Face of the Earth as Seen from the Air

Author: Willis T. Lee

Editor: W. L. G. Joerg

Release date: May 9, 2020 [eBook #62068]
Most recently updated: October 18, 2024

Language: English

Credits: Produced by Chuck Greif, ellinora and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FACE OF THE EARTH AS SEEN FROM THE AIR ***

Contents. Index.: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, Y. List of Illustrations In some instances, the captions have been reunited with the images, making the references to the "opposite" or "following/facing page" irrelevant. (In certain versions of this etext [in certain browsers] clicking on the image will bring up a larger version.) (etext transcriber's note)

THE EARTH SEEN
FROM THE AIR

Fig. 1—The National Capitol, Washington, D. C. A view obliquely downward from a position over the National Botanical Garden, showing the western front of the Capitol at the approach to it from Pennsylvania Avenue. In the background, at the right, can be seen a part of the Library of Congress and, at the left, a part of the Senate Office Building. The radiating avenues of approach are of interest as well as the character of the district surrounding the Capitol, as indicated by the apartment houses and tree-lined streets.

{i}

AMERICAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY
SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 4
W. L. G. Joerg, Editor

# THE FACE OF THE EARTH
AS SEEN FROM THE AIR

A Study in the Application of Airplane
Photography to Geography
BY
WILLIS T. LEE
U. S. Geological Survey
AMERICAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY
BROADWAY AT 156TH STREET
NEW YORK
1922
{ii}
COPYRIGHT, 1922
BY
THE AMERICAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY
OF NEW YORK
CONDÉ NAST PRESS GREENWICH, CONN.

{iii}

## CONTENTS

CHAPTER |  | PAGE
| Introduction | ix
I | The Viewpoint | 1
II | Familiar Scenes From a New Angle | 7
III | Architecture, Landscape Gardening, and Engineering | 11
IV | The Mosaic | 20
V | General Aspects of the Surface As Seen From the Air | 22
VI | Marshes and Marsh Drainage | 27
VII | Coastal Mud Flats | 41
VIII | Submerged Land Forms | 45
IX | The Plain From the Air | 50
X | Mountain Features | 57
XI | Air Craft in the Study of Rocks and Ores | 69
XII | Mapping and Charting From the Air | 72
| Index: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, Y. | 105

{v}{iv}

## LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

(o) indicates an oblique, (v) a vertical airplane photograph

FIG. |  | PAGE
The Viewpoint, and Familiar Scenes From a New Angle
1 | The National Capitol, Washington, D. C. (o) | Frontispiece
2 | Symbols of automatic register in the Eastman mapping camera (v) | 3
3 | The United States Military Academy, West Point, N. Y. (o) | 8
4 | The United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Md. (o) | 9
Architecture, Landscape Gardening, and Engineering
5 | Monument Avenue, Richmond, Va. (o) | 12
6 | The United States Naval Observatory, Washington, D. C. (o). | 13
7 | Shipyards at Newport News, Va. (o) | 14
8 | The New York Connecting Railroad Bridge (o) | 15
9 | A part of Washington, D. C. (o) | 16
10 | Part of Rockaway Beach, Long Island, N. Y. (v) | 17
11 | Part of Long Branch, N. J. (v) | 18
12 | Benning, D. C., and the Anacostia River (v) | 22
13 | The land along the Anacostia River on the eastern edge of Washington, D. C. (v) | facing 22
14 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 13 | facing 22
General Aspects of the Surface
15 | Southeastern part of Mulberry Island on the lower James River, Maryland (v) | 24
16 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 15 | 25
17 | Columbus, Ga. (v) | facing 26
18 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 17 | facing 26
Marshes and Coastal Mud Flats
19 | Tidal marsh and ocean beach at Corsons Inlet, New Jersey (v) | 28
20 | Details of marshland, Lee Marsh, lower Pamunkey River, Virginia (v) | 30
{vi} 21 | Details of marshland, Cousaic Marsh, lower Pamunkey River, Virginia (v) | 31
22 | Barrier beach from Corsons Inlet to Atlantic City, N. J. (v) | 32
23 | A river system in miniature near Hampton, Virginia (v) | 33
24 | Sweet Hall Marsh on the lower Pamunkey River, Virginia (v) | 34
25 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 24, with cross section | 35
26 | Eltham Marsh on the lower Pamunkey River, Virginia (v) | 36
27 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 26, with cross section | 37
28 | A stream system of the mud-flat area off the Eastern Shore of Virginia (v) | 42
29 | Mud-flat streams (v) | 43
Submerged Land Forms
30 | Stove Point Neck at the mouth of the Piankatank River, Virginia (v) | 46
31 | Gwynn Island at the mouth of the Piankatank River, Virginia (v) | 46
32 | Map showing the location of Figs. 31 and 32, with cross section | 47
33 | A drowned valley: Lambs Creek, Chesapeake Bay, Virginia (v) | 48
The Plain From the Air
34 | The Chattahoochee River south of Columbus, Ga. (v) | facing 50
35 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 34 | facing 50
36 | A river channel in the Great Plains: The Red River northeast of Wichita Falls, Tex. (v) | 51
37 | A glacial drift plain in southwestern Michigan (v) | 52
38 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 37 | 53
39 | Schoolcraft, Mich. (v) | 54
40 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 39 | 55
41 | Kettleholes in glacial till southwest of Schoolcraft, Mich. (v) | 56
Mountain Features
42 | Mt. Shasta, California (o) | 58
43 | A glacial gorge on the northeastern face of Mt. Shasta (o) | 59
44 | Yosemite Valley, California (o) | 60
45 | Map showing the angle of vision of Fig. 44 | 61
46 | Cinder Cone on the eastern edge of the northern Sierra Nevada, California (o) | 62
47 | Map showing the angle of vision of Fig. 46 | 63
48 | The top of Cinder Cone (o) | 64
{vii} 49 | Simi Hills northwest of Santa Monica, Cal. (v) | 65
50 | Part of Santa Monica Mountains north of Santa Monica, Cal. (v) | 66
51 | Map of the region between the center of Los Angeles and Santa Monica, Cal., showing the location of Fig. 50 | 67
52 | A young mountain gorge in the San Joaquin Hills, a coastal range in Southern California (v) | 68
53 | Canyon in sedimentary rocks near the mouth of the Pecos River, Texas (v) | 70
Mapping and Charting From the Air
54 | View across the western end of Lake Erie (o) | 73
55 | Map showing the angle of vision of Fig. 54 | 73
56 | Rochester, N. Y. (v) | facing 74
57 | Map of the same area as in Fig. 56 | facing 74
58 | Index map showing the location of the airplane photographs in this book taken on the Atlantic seaboard of the northeastern United States | 75
59 | Marshlands on Chesapeake Bay south of the mouth of the York River, Virginia (v) | 76
60 | Left shore of the York River northwest of Gloucester Point, Va. (v) | 77
61 | The northwestern tip of Sandy Hook, New Jersey (v) | 78
62 | Beach cusps under water near Beach Haven, N. J. (v) | 80
63 | First stage in the formation of an inlet through a barrier beach: near Beach Haven, N. J. (v) | 81
64 | A tidal delta in Shark River Inlet, Belmar, N. J. (v) | 82
65 | A tidal delta, Popes Creek on the lower Potomac River, Virginia (o) | 83
66 | A double tidal delta at Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey (v) | 84
67 | A tidal inlet through the barrier beach south of Beach Haven, N. J. (v) | 85
68 | Beach between Brigantine and Little Egg Inlets, New Jersey (v) | 86
69 | A simple spit: Lower Cedar Point, Maryland, on the lower Potomac River (o) | 87
70 | A recurved spit south of Brigantine Inlet, New Jersey (v) | 88
71 | A recurved spit showing interference with natural growth: The northern end of Ocean City, N. J. (v) | 89
72 | New Point Comfort at the tip of the York-Rappahannock peninsula, Virginia (v) | 90
73 | Spit at Tucker Beach, New Jersey (v) | 91
74 | A land-tied island: Napatree Point, near Watch Hill, R. I. (v) | 92
75 | Powells Creek, Virginia, on the lower Potomac River (o) | 93
{viii} 76 | Roberts Creek, a drowned river valley southeast of Yorktown, Va. (v) | 94
77 | The underwater channel in Quantico Bay on the lower Potomac River, Virginia (v) | 95
78 | Natural channels and shoals near Miami. Fla. (o) | 96
79 | A dredged channel at Miami, Fla. (o) | 97
80 | A shoal in Hereford Inlet north of Wildwood, N. J. (v) | 98
81 | Sand bars at Cape Charles, Va. (v) | 99
82 | Bars, channels, beaches, and marsh near Far Rockaway, Long Island, N. Y. (v) | 100

All of the airplane photographs in this book, both oblique and vertical, were taken by the United States Army Air Service, except Figs. 78 and 79, which were taken by the United States Navy Air Service, and Figs. 10, 65, 69, 75, 77, and 82, which were taken by the author. To these two services the author is indebted for the permission to reproduce their photographs, and this acknowledgment is made with the same force as if made individually under each illustration.

As a guide to the evaluation of the scale of the vertical photographs, which is expressed under each photograph in the form of the natural scale, or representative fraction, the following approximate equivalents may be borne in mind:

1:10,000 = 800+ feet to the inch
1:16,000 = ¼ mile to the inch
1:21,000 = ⅓ mile to the inch

{ix}

## INTRODUCTION

Scarcely a generation has passed during the evolution of the airplane from a ridiculous dream to a practical factor in the work of the world. Men who once read with derision, or only passive interest at best, of the experiments of Langley, Chanute, and the Wrights have seen the airplane developed suddenly into an indispensable instrument of war and an agency of demonstrated value and of such diversity of application that its future is hard to estimate.

The navigation of the air has accomplished much in many fields. Not only does it offer a new means of efficiency in military reconnaissance, rapid delivery of mail, fire patrol of forests, and the constantly increasing number of commercial and scientific pursuits to which it is being adapted; but it has also opened a new world to the geographer, the physiographer, and the geologist.

### Airplane Photography: Its Development and Application

Very early in the war the airplane was recognized as a useful, in fact a necessary, means of observing enemy positions and movements. But the speed of the airplane was found to preclude the taking of more than the most hurried of notes during a flight, and notes written from memory are not the most satisfactory. Photography was found to obviate this difficulty. The ability of the camera to make instantaneous exposures and fix a clear image on a photographic plate enabled the observer to obtain a record not only of the scenes that he had viewed but also of many that he might have missed while engaged in the necessary business of watching the sky for the enemy—a record that for detail and accuracy could not be approached by the most elaborate notes or the most graphic description. Immedi{x}ately inventive genius was set at work to adjust the mechanism of the camera to the demands of air photography and to prepare the rapidly working films and highly sensitized paper necessary for the best results.

So satisfactory were the results and so great are the possibilities of further adaptation that there is an unfortunate tendency on the part of certain enthusiasts to make exaggerated claims that may react to retard progress. This is particularly true in the use of the air photograph in mapping. There are limitations to this use of air photography. It cannot be reasonably expected to do away entirely with the ground work of the surveyor. Rather, the camera is to be regarded as one of the instruments of the surveyor. Observation from the air can never take the place of close examination of the ground, but it can be of great use in the location and study of land forms and geologic relations. Air photography is only an added means of obtaining information, although it promises to become a very important means.

Observations from the air described in numerous reports and articles in geographic magazines during the war and since its close indicate that air craft, especially in connection with air photography, can be of great use in studying the physical features of the face of the earth. In order to make a practical test of the use of the airplane in the study of geography the writer spent about nine months during the year 1920 making flights, taking pictures from air craft, and gathering information from various sources. This book embodies the chief results.

The material presented here is by way of illustrating the possibility of using the airplane and airplane photography as a means of securing information that should become increasingly useful in the study of geography, and of showing geographic and geologic features better than in any other way. The views have been chosen to illustrate the three uses of air photographs with which this book deals—the presentation of new views of subjects of popular interest and the practical value of such views; the study of land forms from a new and advantageous point{xi} of view; and the use of the air photograph as an aid in mapping.

In presenting these illustrations there is no intention that the list of types should be considered in any sense complete. Physiographic observation from the air is a relatively new undertaking, and results are limited and imperfect. As improvements in mechanism and technique are made, observations will be extended and better photographs and a greater variety of them will be secured. Such as are presented here, however, serve to demonstrate that the air photograph will come to be recognized as a valuable source of information for the student of geography and geology.

### Acknowledgments

The results here presented were secured by the co-operation of the Air Services of the United States Army and Navy. Hydroplanes were placed at my disposal on several occasions, and a number of flights were made over water bodies, particularly over the Potomac River, Chesapeake Bay, and New York Harbor. But the information was gathered chiefly through the Army Air Service. Many flights were made in army planes, some for general observation, others for photographing specific objects. Also the army photographers, particularly those at Langley Field, near Newport News, Va., made several photographic trips at my request, and a large number of prints were furnished from negatives stored at this and other flying fields.

In this connection I wish to express appreciation for the many courtesies extended by Major General C. T. Menoher, U. S. A., Chief of Air Service at the time the work was done, and by Major J.W. Simons, Jr., A.S., Acting Administrative Executive, Air Service. These officers placed at my disposal every facility of the service that I could use. It would be a pleasure, if space allowed, to mention the names of the numerous pilots and other officers to whom I am directly indebted for the safe completion of some of the most thrilling adventures of my life. I must, however,{xii} mention the officer to whom I am perhaps more indebted than to any other. My introduction to this study was through Major J.W. Bagley of the United States Army Engineering Corps, who has done much toward making the camera a valuable instrument in mapping.[1] Through his active interest I became acquainted with the officials of the Army Air Service, who gave the necessary authorization for flights and for securing most of the photographs used to illustrate this book. During the time spent at this work I retained my position as geologist of the United States Geological Survey. Hence the work is one of co-operation chiefly between the United States Army Air Service and the United States Geological Survey, and to a lesser degree with the United States Navy Air Service.{1}

## CHAPTER I
THE VIEWPOINT
(Figs. 1 to 4)

### Oblique and Vertical Airplane Photographs

Air photographs are, in general, of two sorts, depending upon whether the photograph was taken with the camera pointing vertically or obliquely downward. In either case the air photographer is free from the limitations that hamper the ground photographer in choosing a point of view. For he can ascend to any desired height and not only select an advantageous position from which to photograph the feature which he wishes to emphasize but also, at the same time, avoid obstacles which might obstruct his view from the ground. Vertical photographs are preferable where the accurate location of objects is desired. When properly taken they serve many of the purposes of maps and are, in many ways, even more useful than maps. They furnish the untrained mind with much of the information that the trained mind reads from a topographic map and, in addition, supply details and relations that a map cannot depict. Exact accuracy, however, cannot be claimed for them until they have been corrected for distortion and adjusted to some system of controls.

Where the photograph is to be used as a means of securing a more advantageous view of a subject than can be had from the ground rather than as a map on which distances are to be scaled off, the oblique photograph is probably the more desirable, since it is as easily intelligible as a photograph taken laterally. The advantage of such photographs is obvious. To the architect, the landscape gardener, the city planner is given the opportunity to study their projects free from all obstructions yet in such perspective that their relations to their surroundings are{2} brought out as would be possible by no other means. Views like that of West Point (Fig. 3) are occasionally to be had from some hilltop, but the limited choice of position on the ground contrasts sharply with the unlimited choice in the air.

### Elements to Be Recorded

Air photography is by no means simple. Much still remains to be done by way of adapting the camera to its peculiar demands. Its present degree of perfection, of course, is largely due to the impetus given its development during the war because of its great importance in military reconnaissance. The adaptation of the camera to operation from the airplane might be described with profit but will be passed with slight mention because it is the results of air photography rather than the mechanism that are to be considered here. Technically, a photograph of the earth’s surface may not be a map, but, given certain means of interpretation, it can be made to serve as such. In using air photographs, particularly the vertical ones, it is desirable to know the scale, which is dependent upon the altitude at which the exposure is made; the angle of the lens; and the variation from the vertical, in order to make corrections for distortion. Therefore, it is desirable that each photograph show the altitude, date, time of day, and position of the lens at which the exposure was made. Cameras have been constructed that automatically record these data on each negative. This information is illustrated in Figure 2. The circular symbol at the left in the white strip at the top of the photograph represents a circular level, or inclinometer. The small round dot close to the center of the inclinometer indicates that, at the time the exposure was made, the axis of the lens was very nearly vertical. The symbol in the center of the white strip indicates an altitude of about 9,800 feet, and that at the right, that the exposure was made 7 seconds after 11 A.M. The other symbols record that this photograph was No. 13 of a series made at Rochester, N. Y., October 23, 1920, with an Eastman mapping camera known as K-2. The{3} symbol 8-P is non-essential and records that this negative is No. 8 of panchromatic film.

Fig. 2—Symbols of automatic register in the Eastman mapping camera, photographed with the body of the picture showing roads, streams, orchards, cultivated fields, etc. For explanation of the symbols, see the text.

The information given by the symbols is corroborated by the picture. Orchard and shade trees appear as circular dots in place of the elongated images characteristic of pictures taken obliquely downward, and the short, squat shadows denote exposure near midday. Shocks of corn standing in the fields show that the season is autumn.{4}

### How to Read Airplane Photographs

Not all the features, however, are so easily recognizable. Oblique photographs are often more readily interpreted than ordinary photographs, since they combine with the usual view the essentials of a plan; but in vertical photographs very few objects present an appearance that is natural in the light of our experience as lateral observers. The uninitiated, on attempting systematically to identify the features of a vertical photograph, find a very large number that are foreign in appearance. A necessary preliminary is an acquaintance with the ground photographed or with similar regions and features. Without such a key the air photograph is not always self-interpretative and is often unintelligible. Military observers are carefully trained to recognize features of military significance. It is not to be expected, however, that they should be trained in the observation of land forms except such as are of military importance. Consequently, whereas a great variety of photographs is now easily obtainable at many flying fields, the information that a scientist would desire concerning them is not so easily available. Most of the photographs used in this paper were taken by men who were not trained in observing land forms. Many were taken simply as a requirement in practice flights and meant so little to the observer that no record was made concerning them. For several not even the location was recorded.

It is of primary importance that the picture be held in the right position. Not only must the observer imagine himself looking directly down on the scene but he must hold the photograph in the position in which experience has shown that the image appears the most natural. Otherwise a depression will appear as an elevation and an elevation as a hollow. It is a well-known fact that in telescopic photographs of the moon the craters appear like hollows when the print is held in one position and like elevations when the position is reversed. Experience{5} shows that if the print is held so that the shadows fall toward the observer the objects appear natural. The reason is that the observer sees only those shadows that are caused by light falling towards him. Consequently, the only interpretation that the brain can give to shadows on a photograph is that they are cast by an elevation between the eye and the light. In a picture, therefore, in which shadows fall away from the eye instead of towards it valleys are seen as hills and hills as valleys. In the northern hemisphere this prescribed orientation conflicts with the convention of placing the north side of a map at the top of the page and also with the modern shaded map on which the light is represented as coming from the upper left, or northwest, corner of the map.

### Failure of Air Photographs to Show Relief, and Measures to Remedy This Defect

In photographs taken from the ground the lights and shadows are such that a high degree of naturalness is possible. But objects seen from directly above, and even those viewed obliquely, though to a lesser degree, are illuminated so uniformly that photographs of them are apt to appear flat. To some extent this has been overcome by the use of extra-sensitive emulsions, special ray filters, and printing papers adapted for accentuating contrast. Many of the photographs used in this book did not allow satisfactory reproduction till the contrast of the negatives was greatly increased by the arts of the photographic laboratory. But, even at its best, no photograph taken vertically affords an adequate idea of the height of hills or the depth of hollows. Only shadows that are particularly well defined can be distinguished as shadows, while small elevations and depressions affect the negative no differently than a difference in marking or color. In military defenses, if the mere surface of the camouflage is sufficiently realistic, the ordinary camera is even more easily deceived than the human eye. It is a well-known fact that man and other animals of the higher order see objects in{6} relief, within a certain range of vision, because the eyes convey to their respective retinas slightly different images of the same object which the brain combines into a relief image. The stereoscopic camera has long been used for the same purpose. Its principle, with certain adaptations that need not be discussed here, has been to some extent employed in airplane pictures, with such excellent results that it is claimed by some that by further development actual contouring will be possible by this means. It is reported that in military reconnaissance stereoscopic pictures render ordinary camouflage useless and that bridges, observation towers, gun emplacements, etc., are shown in relief and, therefore, easily detected.[2] {7}

## CHAPTER II
FAMILIAR SCENES FROM A NEW ANGLE
(Figs. 1, 3, and 4)

Pictures of well-known buildings are of wide appeal. In so far as they create an interest in the activities for which the buildings stand they are distinctly educative. Such widely known buildings as the National Capitol and the Library of Congress are used repeatedly for illustration. They are as welcome as the sight of a familiar face. Any unusual circumstance connected with them is seized upon as an excuse for republishing pictures of them. Views of them from a new angle are always in demand. Not only do air photographs offer a welcome novelty, but they have the added advantage of lifting the subject out of the clutter of surrounding buildings and making it really the central figure of the picture. It would be difficult to get a more impressive view of the National Capitol than that of Figure 1 or a more attractive glimpse of the Naval Academy at Annapolis than that of Figure 4. The objects of chief interest occupy the center of view without distracting obstructions. In the former, the imposing structure of the Capitol building appears in a pleasing setting of minor details. The proximity of the Senate Office Building and the Library of Congress is at once apparent, and the radiating systems of the avenues of approach. Strangers may have wondered as to the nature of the environs of the Capitol. The tree-lined streets and the apartment houses seen in the picture answer the question. In the view of the Naval Academy the buildings occupy the center of the scene, with the beautiful dome of the memorial to John Paul Jones, the first great American naval fighter, prominently in view. Spa Creek in the foreground, a part of the capital city of Maryland at the left, and the Severn River, with its low wooded banks, stretching away{8}

Fig. 3—West Point, N. Y., and the Hudson River. An air view of the United States Military Academy and the gorge of the Hudson. The picture shows the commanding view of the river to be had from the point of land 180 feet above the river on which the Military Academy is located and shows the wisdom of the choice of this spot as one of the chain of redoubts by which the river was fortified during the Revolution.

{9}

Fig. 4—The Naval Academy at Annapolis, Md. Oblique view from an airplane from a position over Eastport in a general northwesterly direction. The water in the foreground is Spa Creek. The Severn River, spanned by the county bridge and the Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad bridge, stretches away to the left. The buildings in the middle of the picture are those of the Naval Academy. The domed mausoleum built in honor of John Paul Jones, which serves as his final resting place, appears at the left. Still farther to the left lies Maryland’s capital city. Of interest is a comparison of the low-lying and stream-cut banks of the drowned valley now occupied by the Severn River with the mountains through which the Hudson River has cut its gorge at West Point (see Fig. 3).

{10}

in the distance, spanned by the county bridge and the Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad bridge, form an interesting setting and show, without detracting from the importance of the academy itself, its advantageous location with regard to the city and the water approaches.{11}

## CHAPTER III
ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE GARDENING, AND ENGINEERING
(Figs. 5 to 14)

Only a few photographs are necessary to show how valuable to the architect, the construction engineer, the city planner, or the landscape gardener the air photograph, both vertical and oblique, is destined to become. Pictorial records of progress in the construction of buildings, bridges, ships, canals, reservoirs, etc., that partake also of the nature of ground plans, as do air photographs, furnish an admirable means of study and comparison. No photograph of the great shipyards at Newport News taken from the ground would show the relation of the shops and drydocks to the deep-water approaches as does Figure 7. Figure 8 gives an unusually comprehensive idea of the location, magnitude, and construction of Hell Gate Bridge; and Figure 10, Rockaway Beach, now a densely populated town where a few years ago was a barren strip of sand, suggests that photographic records of construction in rapidly growing communities where changes are being made in streets, railroads, and buildings, will come to be a part of the equipment of the city engineer and architect.

### Architecture and Landscape Gardening

Equally useful will the air photograph become to the landscape gardener and architect. Heretofore, in order to get a comprehensive conception of his task and a definite picture of its completion, the landscape gardener has had to depend upon the use of maps and such views as could be made by the sketch artist or the ordinary lateral photograph. In the future, from{12} vertical and oblique photographs of the area to be developed, he will have the means of studying its features in their correct proportions and relationship. By means of similar photographs of completed projects he can choose and combine until he has developed the plans best suited to his purpose. He can bring to his aid first-hand studies of gardens and grounds the world over whose beauties have made them famous.

Fig. 5—Monument Avenue, Richmond, Va., and the statue of Robert E. Lee. An oblique photograph illustrating the use of aerial photography in landscape gardening and street planning.

### Engineering Projects Covering Large Areas

Where the project covers large areas, the “mosaic,” or group of matched photographs, can be used in the study of problems of construction or improvement. Figure 13, a mosaic of the Anacostia flats, the site of improvements under way in the District{13}

Fig. 6—The United States Naval Observatory and grounds, Washington, D.C., as seen from an airplane at a height of a few hundred feet above the ground, showing an unusually attractive arrangement of shrubbery and trees.

of Columbia, shows the Anacostia marshes as they appeared in the autumn of 1920, after the changes effected since 1915, as can be seen by comparison with Figure 14, the topographic map of the same area. To the right is the terraced slope rising to a height of about 150 feet above the river—an elevation so low that the air photograph does not properly reproduce it. Near the foot of the principal terrace lie the tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad, on which can be seen Benning, Deanewood, and Kenilworth. Between the railroad and the Anacostia River are the Benning race track and the swampy lowland and tidal marshes of the Anacostia flats. The river and the marshland on either side of it from the Pennsylvania Avenue Bridge to Benning Road have been modified by dredging, but north of{14}

Fig. 7—Shipyards at Newport News, Va., showing docks and deep-water approaches, steamships, and drydocks, in one of which is a vessel for repairs.

{15}

Fig. 8—The New York Connecting Railroad Bridge, which affords an all-rail passenger and freight route between Boston and Washington. The bridge, which was completed in 1917, starts on the mainland in the Port Morris section of southern Bronx Borough, New York City, seen in the background, then crosses Bronx Kill, Randalls Island, Little Hell Gate, Wards Island, and Hell Gate to reach the Long Island shore, seen in the extreme lower right corner, at Long Island City, Queens Borough. The tracks continue towards Washington by way of tunnels under the East River and the Hudson.

{16}

Fig. 9—A part of Washington, D.C., showing the White House, Treasury, State-War-Navy, and other public buildings in the foreground; the Ellipse, Washington Monument, and new War and Navy offices in the middle ground; and the Tidal Basin, Potomac Park, and the Potomac River in the distance. By no other means could so informative a glimpse be given of a spot of such wide interest. Every feature in the picture is more or less familiar to a large number of Americans, but their familiarity is with the individual features rather than with their situation and relation to one another as shown here.

{17}

Fig. 10—Part of Rockaway Beach, Long Island, N.Y., showing city blocks, streets, and buildings covering the sand which a few {18}years ago was barren and unoccupied. Scale, about 1: 6,700.

Fig. 11—Landscape gardening. An airplane view of a part of Long Branch, N.J., taken from a height of 10,000 feet, showing the beach and surf at the right, and the streets, mansions, driveways, and lawns in the body of the picture—an example of the development of a barrier beach of little value before the exploitation for summer {19}homes. Scale, about 1: 15,000.

this road the surface appears in its natural state. In the mosaic are shown at the left the highlands west of the marshes, wooded in some places but cleared and improved in others. In the northern part can be seen land wooded north of the District line but cleared south of it. So comprehensive a view of the field of the project and of the progress to date should be of great service to the engineers and promoters.{20}

## CHAPTER IV
THE MOSAIC
(Figs. 13 and 22)

In its simplest form, the mosaic is made by mounting overlapping prints so that the corresponding details coincide. This type of mosaic is quite adequate for relatively small areas or where a high degree of accuracy is not required. For larger areas and greater accuracy, an accurate outline map is used as a base upon which the prints are mounted so that recognizable features coincide with their location on the map. When the prints are properly arranged, the better print of each overlapping pair is selected, the excess paper removed, and the whole mounted and photographed. Figure 13 is left untrimmed to illustrate the method of matching the overlapping prints. The differences in shade are due to difference in printing and developing the pictures which make up the mosaic. The slight offsetting of line at the junction of the prints may be due to errors in mounting, shrinking, or stretching of the photographic paper, tilting of the camera at the time of exposure, or other cause. Such errors and imperfections illustrate the difficulty of using these photographs in the making of maps.

A skillful manipulation of both airplane and camera is necessary to the success of the mosaic. To prevent distortion and variation of scale, the camera must be maintained at the same altitude at all times and pointed directly downward. This can be accomplished by flying with an even keel at a uniform altitude. Mechanical devices are also being perfected to accomplish the same result. Still greater skill is necessary when consecutive rows of exposures are made for the purpose of placing strips of photographs side by side to cover a large area. It is difficult under the varying conditions of wind and weather to{21} fly so evenly and so nearly at the same level that distortions and differences in scale are not noticeable. Strong objection to the mosaic is frequently raised because of inaccuracies due to difference in scale in neighboring prints. Until these defects are overcome, such a group of matched photographs cannot take the place of an accurate map. Much, however, is being done to correct these defects, and, even in photographs where inaccuracies in scale are many, the value of the photograph for the portrayal of detail cannot be denied.{22}

## CHAPTER V
GENERAL ASPECTS OF THE SURFACE AS SEEN FROM THE AIR
(Figs. 12 to 18)

Fig. 12—Benning, D.C., and the Anacostia River, showing, from right to left, cultivated lands 40 to 20 feet above sea level, an elevation too slight to be shown in a vertical photograph; a brushy slope running from 20 feet to sea level; and marshland along the stream. The checkered pattern of the upland fields is caused by different-colored crops. Shocks of corn, spaced evenly in rows, buildings and shade trees, and light-colored roads and a race track are shown. The light-colored areas along the stream are occupied by tidal marsh and are free from brush but covered with vegetation of annual growth. The figure is one of the photographs used to make the mosaic shown on Fig. 13. It should be compared with Fig. 13 and with the topographic map, Fig. 14. Scale, 1: 11,000.

When a region is viewed from an altitude of several thousand feet the observer can readily imagine himself looking down on a large map. The chief features stand out prominently, the smaller to a lesser degree. Mountains, rivers, and the seashore are

Fig. 13—Vertical photograph of the land along the Anacostia River on the eastern edge of Washington, D.C., made up of several photographs matched together and adjusted to points located by ordinary survey methods, and reduced in size to correspond with the map, Fig. 14. The photographs were taken from an airplane with a so-called mapping camera at such intervals of time that the prints overlap, thus making it possible to adjust them to each other and to form a continuous picture of the area. The region shown is the site of improvements that are at present under way, mainly the regulation of the Anacostia River. The channel has been widened by dredging and part of the bordering marsh areas filled in. The photograph shows that this work had progressed to the Benning Road bridge by the autumn of 1920, when the photograph was taken, while in 1915, when the area was surveyed for the map, it had been carried out only as far as the Pennsylvania Avenue bridge. Such airplane photographs furnish an incomparable tool in the handling of large-scale engineering projects, both in the study of the territory in its unimproved state and to follow the progress of the work after operations are under way. Scale, about 1: 28,000.

Fig. 14—Part of the topographic map of Washington and Vicinity, 1: 31,680, published by the U.S. Geological Survey, showing within the irregular line the same area shown in Fig. 13. Scale, 1: 28,000.

{23}

Fig. 15 (on page 24)—Mosaic of the southeastern part of Mulberry Island, on the left bank of the James River about 11 miles northwest of Newport News. Va., showing an area portrayed by many photographs matched together. Slight differences in shade indicate the junction of the separate prints. The higher land, about 10 feet above sea level as determined by surveys on the ground, is shown at the right by roads and cultivated fields. It is to be noted that roads outline the dividing line between the high ground and the marsh. At the left are lower areas of wooded or brushy swampland and of grassy marsh. They contain a number of abandoned channels: some completely silted up, others containing small thoroughfares, and still others drained by meandering streams which seem to have developed after the channels were definitely abandoned by the streams which originally occupied them.

The streams which drain the marshes have many characteristics of streams which drain higher lands. They have dendritic patterns, so called from resemblance to the forking branches of a tree; channels which widen downstream; and winding or meandering courses. The island terminates in a long spit composed of silt and fine sand. The banks to the left on James River are low and marshy: those to the right on Warwick Creek, except for one small marsh, form low bluffs.

In order that the mosaic may be compared with the map, Fig. 16, it has been placed with the northerly part at the top of the page, with the result that, until the page is reversed, the trees in the swampland appear like hollows in the earth. Scale, 1:14,000.

especially conspicuous. Streams appear as smooth, winding ribbons—glistening if the sunlight reflected from them enters the eye, dark if the bright rays are reflected away from the eye. Railroads can easily be traced and towns recognized by their form. Concrete roads and others of light-colored material are plainly visible. Those built of dark-colored material appear less prominently. Something even of the character of the forests can be ascertained—whether evenly timbered or partly of primary and partly of secondary growth; whether intact or partly burned over; whether consisting chiefly of one species of trees or of many. The cultivated fields and their relations to roads, streams, and forests are conspicuous. Towns and cities are spread out like panoramic views in which are strikingly visible the residence and manufacturing centers, the layout of streets, the systems of parks, the position of suburbs, and the relation of these to routes of transportation and travel—roads, railroads, and waterways. These and many other features of the landscape—swamps, marshes, buildings, trees, orchards, and many lesser details—are recognizable and are all recorded on the{24}

{25}

Fig. 16—The same area as shown in Fig. 15 reduced from a section of a map on the scale of 1:10,000 by the Corps of Engineers, U.S.A. The photographs shown in Fig. 15 were used for mapping certain small features on this map, such as small streams. Scale, 1:14,000.

{26}

photographic negative. So faithfully does the camera reproduce all the horizontal features within its range of vision that it is conceivable that a photograph correctly dated might become a valuable record in cases of boundary disputes or other litigations involving the position of fences, fields, roads, or even streams, at a given date.

Fig. 17—Columbus. Ga. A part of a mosaic made at Camp Benning near-by in 1909 showing the town, river, and surrounding country. The scale is so small that buildings and trees appear as dots, city blocks as small parallelograms, streets and roads as light-colored lines. The cultivated fields appear as irregularly checkered areas, and the concentric lines of the terraced slopes have the appearance of contour lines on a topographic map (see Fig. 18). The picture illustrates many of the features of city geography. The comparatively straight course of the river and the heavy growth of trees and bushes along its edges indicate a minimum of flood-plain and steep banks—an inference supported by the fact that the principal business center of the city, shown by large, closely set roofs, is built close to the river. Surrounding this section is the most densely populated district, which in the northern part of the city gives way to a district of houses set farther apart and separated by lawns set with trees. Other less extensive business centers are shown as small spots of closely grouped buildings. A variety of suburban types is to be seen: some quite city-like, with a business center, a densely populated residential district, and a district of houses separated by grounds; others more village-like in their lack of a well-developed center but still more or less completely separated from the city proper; still others, sporadic scatterings of houses and grounds extending from the city for some distance along the principal roads. The railroad center is located conveniently near the business center, and the radiating lines of road and railroad communications are in strong contrast to the rectangular arrangement of the city streets. Factories, indicated by large, light-colored roofs, are located along the railroad in the southern part of the city and along the river to the north. Those along the river are operated by power from the falls which the picture shows. The terraced slopes are characteristic of the region, the farmers here and elsewhere in the South making these terraces in their plowed fields to prevent rain water from washing away the soil. Scale, about 1:38,000.

Fig. 18—Map of the same area shown in Fig. 17 enlarged from the corresponding sections of the 1:62,500 Columbus and Seale, Ga.-Ala., and the 1:125,000 Talbotton and Opelika, Ga.-Ala., topographic sheets surveyed mainly in 1906 and 1907 and published by the U.S. Geological Survey. The cross section at the bottom lies along the line indicated on the map and extends somewhat beyond the right border of the map. The section shows the broad shelf upon which the city rests and its relation to the river and to the terraced hillsides east of it. Scale, 1:38,000.

{27}

## CHAPTER VI
MARSHES AND MARSH DRAINAGE
(Figs. 19 to 27)

Mention has been made of the objects seen better from the air than from any viewpoint on the ground; but there are some objects which as a whole can be seen only from above. Swamps, parts of everglades, peaks in the midst of difficult country, precipitous canyon walls, and many volcanic craters cannot be seen from the ground without undue effort. Photographs of bluffs, terraces, and other slopes facing bodies of water have hitherto been adequately obtainable only from the water. All of these can be readily viewed and photographed from the airplane. Pictorial representations of drainage systems were rare until photographs such as Figure 19 were taken from airplanes. The intricate drainage of marshes like those along the Pamunkey River in Virginia pictured in Figure 20 was never accurately shown until photographed from the air.

Of frequent occurrence on the Atlantic Coastal Plain of the United States are swamps and marshes inaccessible from the ground. Much of the surface material is so soft that they cannot be easily traversed; and, even where firm enough to support a man’s weight, few of the details are deemed of sufficient importance to warrant the trouble and expense of mapping by ordinary methods. Yet the trapper would scarcely admit that these details are unimportant, and, to the student, they are an interesting feature of marsh topography that has thus far received little attention.

Figure 25 is part of the excellent New Kent, Va., sheet of the topographic map and is probably as detailed as a map of this character should be when made from ground surveys only. However, on comparison of the map with a{28} photograph of the same area (Fig. 24), there is no difficulty in detecting errors; and it is probable that, had the photograph been available when the map was made, the marshes would have been represented differently.

Fig. 19—Stream development in a tidal marsh, showing, at the right, the northern end of Ludlam Beach, about 6 miles south of Ocean City, N.J., and the mouth of Corsons Inlet leading to Ludlam Bay, and, at the left, the marsh just west of the inlet, with streams rising close to the bank of the larger stream at the extreme left and flowing in meandering courses across the marsh. The great variety of types of vegetation probably is one cause of the remarkable meandering of these drainage lines by reason of the fact that the accumulated remains as well as the annual growth of different weeds and grasses offer varying resistance to the current of the streams. Scale, about 1:10,000.

{29}

### Marsh Drainage

One of the most striking characteristics of marsh topography illustrated by the photographs presented here is the great wealth of drainage lines and the resemblance of the drainage patterns to those of river systems developed on higher ground. The dendritic patterns, the meanders, and the sharply outlined divides are surprising in areas which have altitudes varying from only a few inches to a little more than a foot at times of ordinary high tide and which are wholly submerged at times of maximum tide. Some of the streams have gently winding courses suggestive of normal stream development. Others, particularly the smaller, have a conspicuous angularity of course. It is possible that the latter may have originated as the trails of animals. Some of the lines are observed to cross the larger streams and are probably tracks made by muskrats. Some of the streams rise close to the river’s brink and lead to through-going waterways near the center of the marsh. This suggests the deposition of silt on the brink of the river at times of high water. The notched appearance of the shore in Figure 20 seems to be due to overhanging bunches of sedge grass and, in some instances, to the breaking away of the surface mat or crust of the marsh formed by the interlacing roots of grass. The mottled appearance of the marsh in this picture may be partly due to shadow of clouds, but to some extent, at least, the difference in shade is caused by differences in the character of the plants.

The marshes used for illustration here are typical of many along the Atlantic Coast. They are situated near West Point, Va. The Pamunkey and the Mattaponi Rivers both rise in the Piedmont Plateau, flow southeastward through the tidewater{30} portion of Virginia, and join about midway of the Coastal Plain to form the York River[3] (see Fig. 58).

Fig. 20—Details of marshland. A part of Lee Marsh near West Point, Va. (cf. Fig. 26), as photographed from a height of 2,000 feet, June, 1920. Local observers report that this marsh has been submerged only twice in nineteen years. The drainage systems are well entrenched. The larger stream channels are cut 1 to 5 feet or more below low tide (the tidal variation at West Point is about 3.4 feet), and their form is made stable by the tough surface crust of the marsh, consisting of the matted roots of the luxuriant sedge grass. The intricate, veinlike appearance of the drainage lines and the furry appearance of the edges of all the waterways, showing overhanging vegetation, are of interest. Drainage systems flowing in opposite directions slow connecting tributaries apparently silted up. Scale, about 1:4,000.

{31}

Fig. 21—Details of frequently submerged marshland. A part of Cousaic Marsh on the Pamunkey River, near Sweet Hall, Va. (cf. Fig. 24), as photographed from a height of 2,000 feet, June, 1920. The surface of the marsh is covered with water several times each year, according to local report. It is relatively soft, and a comparison with Fig. 20 shows an apparently different, less dense vegetation than that of Lee Marsh, which is rarely submerged. The stream channels are less definitely fixed and lack the evidence of overhanging vegetation. Scale, about 1:4,000.

{32}

Fig. 22—Atlantic City and Ocean City, N.J. Strips of photographs taken from an airplane, March, 1920, from a height of 10,000 feet, showing, in order from east to west: the ocean water, which appears dark-colored; the surf, white where it breaks into foam; the light-colored beach sand; the cities laid out on the sand of the barrier beach; and the marshes, channels, and drainage systems west of the barrier. West of Peck Beach in the strip of photograph at the right many features characteristic of salt marsh areas of the Coastal Plain are shown back of the barrier beach. The right strip forms the southern continuation of the left strip. Scale, about 1:75,000.

{33}

Fig. 23—A river system in miniature. A small stream near Hampton, Va., showing flood plain, meanders, an ox-bow lake and cut-off, abandoned channels and a delta partly under water. Scale, not known.

{34}

Fig. 24—Sweet Hall Marsh on the lower Pamunkey River, near West Point, Va., as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet at 11 A.M., December 11, 1920. Cousaic Marsh lies to the left and Hill Marsh to the right of the central meander. Some of the watercourses in these marshes are thoroughfares, or channels opening to the river at both ends, that can be traversed by boat at high tide. But many of them are quite different in nature, beginning as minute rills and broadening toward the mouth in a manner suggesting typical drainage channels on higher land. Scale, about 1:31,000.

{35}

Fig. 25—The same area as shown in Fig. 24, enlarged from the New Kent, Va., topographic sheet, 1:62,500, published by the U.S. Geological Survey. The cross section at the left lies along the line indicated on the map and extends somewhat beyond its borders. The somewhat greater height of the map than of the photograph, although both cover exactly the same area, is due to the unavoidable slight difference in tilt of each of the exposures of which the photographic mosaic is made up. This illustrates the fact that airplane photographs cannot be directly used as equivalent to maps, until the necessary adjustments have been made. Experiments in camera construction are under way to overcome these difficulties by automatic devices. Scale, 1:31,000.

{36}

Fig. 26—Eltham Marsh on the lower Pamunkey River, as photographed from an altitude of about 10,000 feet at 11 A.M., December 11, 1920. At the right lies the town of West Point, Va., at the junction of the Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers, and at the left appears a part of Lee Marsh. Eltham Marsh, in the center of the illustration, is traversed by a so-called thoroughfare, through which boats of light draft make their way at high tide. At one point in the middle of the marsh the thoroughfare is perceptibly broader than elsewhere, and the tidal currents entering from opposite ends of the thoroughfare meet there and cause slack water in which silt is deposited, forming mud flats exposed at low tide. The cultivated fields south of the marsh are on a bench about 10 feet higher than the marsh. Scale, about 1:31,000.{37}

Fig. 26—Eltham Marsh on the lower Pamunkey River, as photographed from an altitude of about 10,000 feet at 11 A.M., December 11, 1920. At the right lies the town of West Point, Va., at the junction of the Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers, and at the left appears a part of Lee Marsh. Eltham Marsh, in the center of the illustration, is traversed by a so-called thoroughfare, through which boats of light draft make their way at high tide. At one point in the middle of the marsh the thoroughfare is perceptibly broader than elsewhere, and the tidal currents entering from opposite ends of the thoroughfare meet there and cause slack water in which silt is deposited, forming mud flats exposed at low tide. The cultivated fields south of the marsh are on a bench about 10 feet higher than the marsh. Scale, about 1:31,000.

Fig. 27—The same area as shown in Fig. 26, enlarged from the New Kent, Va., topographic sheet, 1:62,500, published by the U.S. Geological Survey. It is obvious that many interesting details shown by the photograph are missed or neglected as unimportant in the most careful mapping. The cross section at the left lies along the line indicated on the map and extends somewhat beyond its borders. Scale, 1:31,000.

{38}

The York is one of the estuaries of the tidewater portion of Virginia, and the water level at West Point, the junction of the two tributaries, rises and falls about 3½ feet under tidal action. The Pamunkey is affected by the tide 53 miles by channel above West Point, and the Mattaponi 42 miles. Much of the broad lowland along these rivers is marshy, but the largest marshes are found near West Point, where the river current in swinging from side to side has formed great meanders. For some reason the valleys eroded long ago by these streams have filled with sediment here to a greater extent than farther downstream; perhaps because this is essentially the head of sea water, so that the checking of the current of the river causes it to deposit much of its load. Sea water regularly mingles with the river water as far upstream as West Point, but above this point the water is chiefly fresh. The marshes consist of soft mud and muck to a considerable depth. A well driven in Hill Marsh to an underlying artesian horizon penetrated 50 feet of this soft material before entering rock such as is exposed in the river bank. The thickness of the mud is comparable to the maximum depth of the York farther downstream and suggests that the old valley which there is filled with water is here filled to a depth of 50 feet or more with sediment brought down by the river. Only a small part of the marsh near the landward margin has surface material firm enough to support the weight of large animals except when the surface is frozen.

Many kinds of marsh plants grow here, among which is sedge grass (Spartina cynosuroides (L.) Willd.), which grows to a height of 10 feet or more and forms dense thickets. Its roots interlace{39} to form a tough mat which in some places will support the weight of a man. In other places the soft muck reaches to the surface.

### “Thoroughfares”

These marshes are cut by a few waterways open at both ends, known as thoroughfares, or tidal runs, which also serve as the trunk streams through which the marsh is drained. Some of the thoroughfares may be trunk streams modified by tides, or they may be silted remnants of abandoned river channels. Some seem to be channels in the last stages of silting. The incoming tide enters the down-river end but ascends the thoroughfare more slowly than it ascends the river. The tide in the river reaches the upper end of the thoroughfare, enters it, and meets the opposing tide within the marsh near the upstream end of the passageway. Where the tides meet, thus causing slack water, silt is deposited and mud flats are formed. In Eltham Marsh (Fig. 26) these flats are well within the marsh. In the larger thoroughfares of Sweet Hall Marsh (Fig. 24) the tide passes entirely through while the tide in the river is making its long way around, so that slack water and the deposition of silt occur at the extreme upper end of the passage. In all of the thoroughfares the silting has reached the stage that precludes their use by boat, except at times of high water. Even at high tide some are navigable only by small skiffs, although throughout much of the course the water is many feet deep.

Some of the thoroughfares become narrow and shallow upstream in a manner that suggests that they originate as two normal streams flowing in opposite directions from a common point and that they were later united by the breaking down of the divide between their headwaters. Such a junction might be affected by an unusually high tide breaking through a divide and cutting a channel. Such a divide, be it noted, consists of soft mud only a few inches above the general level and might readily be broken down. In some instances the connection may have originated as an animal trail, as we have seen. Muskrats,{40} otters, and other marsh animals use the waterways as lines of travel and make paths in between them from one to another. Apparently many of the small drainage lines originated in this way, but in some instances stream systems of considerable size and complexity are independent of all others and possess all the characteristics of normally developed river systems.{41}

## CHAPTER VII
COASTAL MUD FLATS
(Figs. 28 and 29)

Of frequent occurrence along the Atlantic Coast of the United States are low mud flats which are practically at sea level and which are covered with water at times of high tide. Where these tracts are exposed to the air during ebb tide for so short a time that plants have not taken root and where the surface material is fine-grained and soft, the tracts are known as mud flats. In the part of the peninsula between Delaware and Chesapeake Bays belonging to the state of Virginia which is called the Eastern Shore a low barrier beach of sand has formed on the ocean side several miles off shore, and the space between this and the mainland is occupied by mud flats, broad, shallow lagoons, and an intricate maze of interlacing channels and winding, branching, interlocking, vermicular streams.

The mud flats are exposed for a short time during low tide, and, as the surface of the water here rises and falls with the tide more than 4 feet, with a maximum fluctuation considerably greater, large volumes of water are continually flowing backward and forward over the flats. As the tide rises, strong currents of sea water set in through the inlets, flow up the main channels and through the thoroughfares, and gradually find their way into the countless small channels and out of them over the broad level stretches of soft mud. As the tide falls, this action is reversed, and the broad sheet of water finds its way by devious paths through the winding watercourses out to sea. The larger channels extend considerably below the surface at times of highest water and may be quite deep even at times of low water. They are, perhaps, stream courses excavated before the region was drowned. Many of the smaller channels also have the gen{42}eral form characteristic of normal stream channels, although others show peculiarities not common to subaerial drainage. The origin of these submarine and tidal features is not well understood, but the photographs of them show their form and furnish some basis for a study of them.

Fig. 28—A stream system of the mud-flat area on the ocean side of the Eastern Shore, Virginia. The light-colored area is beach sand above water. The treelike form is a stream system of subnormally developed pattern. Note the seeming uncertainty of course, some of the branch streams rising close to the mouth of the trunk stream; the junction of branches at the head; and the “frostwork” patterns. Scale not known.

{43}

Fig. 29—Mud-flat streams, showing curious frostwork pattern at the head of underwater channels. Note the pools and the veinlike drainage lines from them. Scale not known.

The photographs reproduced as Figures 28 and 29 were taken northeast of Cape Charles, Virginia, in the summer of 1920 at low tide. The light-colored ribbon-like bands represent water-filled channels; and the darker-colored areas, either wet mud ex{44}posed to the air or mud slightly submerged. However, photographs taken under certain conditions of light may show the exact line between the exposed and the drowned portions of a land surface.{45}

## CHAPTER VIII
SUBMERGED LAND FORMS
(Figs. 30 to 33)

Heretofore the study of beaches, deltas, and other partly submerged land forms has been chiefly confined to the exposed parts, the underwater forms being largely matters of conjecture. By means of air photographs not only can the exposed parts of the delta and beach be studied, but the forms of shoals and terraces, the underwater portions of river deltas, tidal deltas and their underwater distributaries, and many other submerged forms can be shown clearly. Sand bars, terraces, and other submerged forms appear in many of the photographs already presented; but a few so taken that the bars and terraces appear to be the chief objects in the picture may be useful for illustrating the underwater land forms and for demonstrating that these forms can be successfully photographed. Unfortunately not many photographs could be found which were taken with the express object in view of illustrating underwater land features. In most of the available photographs these features were only incidental, the chief purpose in taking them being to photograph the shore.

Much has been written concerning the physiographic history of the Atlantic Coastal Plain of the United States, and the question is still being debated whether the land is rising, sinking, or stationary. To some extent these questions are answered by the exposed land forms. The submarine forms are imperfectly known. The possibility of recognizing shoals and channels from a photograph and of determining in some measure the shapes of the submerged land forms opens a new avenue of approach to the study of submarine geography. In some places, especially in regions of drowned topography, it is possible that, by using the{46} air photograph in working out the physiographic processes that have produced the land forms that are now under water, some of the vexing problems of earth history may be solved.

Fig. 30 (left)—Sand bars and drowned terrace about Stove Point Neck, at the mouth of the Piankatank River, Virginia, as photographed from a height of about 10,000 feet at 11:30 A.M., December 11, 1920. West (left) of the neck, at the outer edge of the terrace, the water is 2 to 3 feet deep at low tide, or 5.7 feet and 6.7 feet at high tide, but deepens abruptly westward, where it is 20 to 30 feet deep in Fishing Bay (see Fig. 32). To the south and east of the point the abrupt descent is at the side of the deep channel of the Piankatank River. To the right, the bottom, having a wavy appearance because of sand bars, fades off more gradually under deep water. The mottled area in the middle of the neck is wooded, and the smoother parts near the point and in the upper part of the neck are cleared land. Scale, about 1:30,000.
Fig. 31 (right)—Drowned terraces at Gwynn Island at the mouth of the Piankatank River, Virginia, as photographed from a height of about 10,000 feet at 11:30 A.M., December 11, 1920. At the right is a part of the island, showing trees, fields, and houses. Bordering the land area is a narrow band of light-colored beach sand, expanded at Cherry Point into a conspicuous sharply recurved hook. Under the shallow water can be seen wave marks resembling large ripple marks. The water is 2 to 3 feet deep at low tide at the outer edge of the light-colored submerged shelf, beyond which the bottom descends abruptly toward the left to a depth of about 20 feet. North of Cherry Point the waxy bottom shades off more gradually to the deep channel of the Piankatank. Scale, about 1:30,000.

{47}

### The Best Conditions for Photographing Underwater Land Forms

Fig. 32—Part of the Kilmarnock and Mathews, Va., topographic sheets, 1:62,500, published by the U. S. Geological Survey, showing the location of Figs. 31 and 32; and a cross section along the line indicated on the map, showing a terrace 26 feet above sea level at the left, one less than 5 feet above water level on Gwynn Island, one 5 feet or less below water level; and the river channel with abrupt banks between the shoals. Scale, 1:70,000.

The photographic study of underwater land forms is relatively new, and little information concerning it is available. It is annoyingly obvious to the air observer that at times he can see nothing beneath the surface of the water, whereas at other{48}

Fig. 33—A drowned valley: Lambs Creek, 8 miles southeast of Yorktown, Va., one of the estuary-streams tributary to Chesapeake Bay, showing the broad mouth narrowing upstream and the irregular margins caused by partial submergence of the valley slopes, eroded before the rise of the water to its present height. Even the vertical photograph, which does not register relative elevations, shows a distinct difference between the shore line of this type of body of water and rivers with broad, low flood plains. The large trees close to the margin of the river and the cultivated fields just back of them indicate a relatively high bank. Scale, about 1:9,000.

{49}

times he can see with great distinctness. In trying to ascertain the most favorable conditions for such observation, it was found that submerged objects are seen best when the sky is evenly overcast or when it is uniformly clear. Sometimes when the sky is only partly cloudy the surface of the water seems to act as a mirror and nothing is seen but the reflection of cloud and sky. Waves have less effect on the visibility of objects beneath the surface than was expected, although they diffuse the reflected light to some extent and consequently weaken the image on the negative. But the reflected light from the surface of the water is stronger than that coming from objects under water. Hence, to photograph underwater features successfully, a time should be chosen when direct reflection of light from the sun or from a brightly illuminated cloud will not enter the lens.

Experience in both the air and the laboratory shows that the best results are likely to be obtained when the sunlight strikes the surface at an oblique angle. In summer favorable times are mid-forenoon or mid-afternoon under an evenly illuminated sky. In winter the sun is low enough at midday to avoid direct reflection into the lens. But experience also indicates that often photographs taken at moments when the eye caught the image of a submerged object show only the surface of the water.{50}

## CHAPTER IX
THE PLAIN FROM THE AIR
(Figs. 34 to 41)

### A River on the Great Plains

The difficulty of photographing a plain from a point on its surface needs no emphasis, but its successful representation by means of air photographs is illustrated by many figures in this book. The Great Plains of the west-central part of the United States are illustrated here by a view of the Red River (Fig. 36), which shows the flat surface of the land and the broad sandy bed of the river only partly covered by the intricately woven strands of the braided channels—a scene characteristic of the Great Plains.

### Meandering Streams on the Coastal Plain

The ox-bow curves of meandering streams are among the features of the earth’s surface most familiar to the student of physical geography; yet, heretofore, they have been illustrated only by maps, constructed at great labor and expense. Comprehensive photographs of them are rare and are, at best, imperfect and unsatisfactory for purposes of illustration. On the other hand, meandering streams lend themselves admirably to air photography. Equally familiar to the student of geography and physiography is the term “abandoned meander.” These ancient stream courses, many of which are now occupied by marsh, brush, or forest, have been still more difficult to illustrate by means of photographs. In some instances wooded meanders like those near Columbus, Ga. (Fig. 34), long ago abandoned by the stream that formed them, are shown in air pictures in a manner but little less conspicuous than the meanders of the present-day stream. It is believed that instructors will find Figure 34 useful, not only in illustrating meandering streams and abandoned meanders but also in showing how meanders develop.

Fig. 34—The Chattahoochee River south of Columbus, Ga., showing the results of progressive lateral shifting of a meandering stream. In the upper part of the illustration to the left (west) of the stream are light-colored concentric markings which probably represent the gradual shifting of the stream toward the right. As interpreted from the information at hand, this section of the stream at one time occupied a position much farther west than now. It cut away the bank on the east, forming a curved course, depositing sand and mud on the inside of the curve. This typical feature of stream erosion and deposition is to be noted from the picture of the present course of the stream. At the outside of each meander stretches of the bank appear light-colored and denuded of the trees and bushes that line the bank elsewhere. These are scours, a slipping away of the bluff caused by the cutting of the stream into the foot of the bank at points where the velocity of the outside of the current, and consequently its corrosive power, is increased as it swings round the curve. The inside of the sharpest meander shows also the deposit of material due to the fact that the velocity of the inside of the current is checked by the bank, causing it to deposit some of its load. Added to this deposit is much of the material brought by cross-currents from the opposite-lying scour. The light-colored banks are probably successive deposits. Finally, either by a gradual wearing away or by some whim of the current at flood tide, the river chose a shorter course, leaving its old channel as an abandoned meander. Farther south several abandoned meanders may be distinguished, each distinctively marked by a steep bank on the outside of the curve and concentric bandings on the inside. The abandoned channels are especially marked by the trees and brush that fill them in many places. It appears that a well-developed growth of trees is to be found only along the river banks in this region and the growth in the abandoned channels is probably due to the fact that in flood time there is much seepage of water into these old channels if not an actual overflow from the present course of the stream. At the bottom of the picture is to be seen the recently made land under cultivation. The fields appear striated and checkered, obscuring the concentric banding. The illustration is from a mosaic made up at Camp Benning near-by of many photographs matched together, hence there are certain differences in shade due to dark and light prints. Scale, about 1:38,000.

Fig. 35—Map of the same area shown in Fig. 34 enlarged from the corresponding sections of the Columbus and Seale, Ga.-Ala., topographic sheets, 1:62,500, published by the U. S. Geological Survey. The cross section at the bottom lies along the line indicated on the map and extends somewhat beyond the right border of the map. The section shows between the hills the broad lowland over which the Chattahoochee River has meandered. Scale, 1:38,000.

{51}

Fig. 36—A river channel in the Great Plains. The Red River northeast of Wichita Falls, Tex., as photographed from a height of 8,000 feet, September 12, 1918. Between the bluffs is seen the dark-colored water of the braided stream flowing on a broad sandy bed more than a mile wide, which is completely covered with water only at flood time. The river forms the Texas-Oklahoma boundary, and frequent changes in the position of the channel during periods of high water make the exact position of the interstate boundary uncertain and give rise to disputes and litigation over the ownership of land. North of the river (top of figure) to the right are sand dunes with a sprinkling of trees and bushes; in the middle of the channel there is an island of light-colored sand. The stream channel bites sharply into the southern bluff, which is cut by many strong gulches. Across the river is the familiar sand flat built of the material washed downstream at flood time and spread out by the subsiding water. The channel at this point shows the changes that have taken place in the position of the stream and, where the stream crosses the sandy floor, affords an example of braiding. Scale, about 1:23,000.

{52}

Fig. 37—A characteristic glacial drift plain in southwestern Michigan. There appear, at the left, the round surface of a terminal moraine and gullied slopes, which show mottled in the picture; morainic hollows and kettleholes once partly filled with water but now filled with peat or occupied by marshes formed by the accumulation of peat from plant growth until carbonaceous matter has replaced the water of the original lake; in the center, a relatively smooth outwash plain characterized by straight roads and well-cultivated fields; and, at the right, a brush-lined creek, a small reservoir, and the town of Flowerfield. Scale, about 1:20,000.

{53}

Fig. 38—The same area as shown in Fig. 37, enlarged from the advance edition, 1:48,000, of the Schoolcraft, Mich., topographic sheet to be published by the U. S. Geological Survey. This advance sheet results from an experiment in the use of airplanes for mapping. The area was photographed with a mapping camera. From the photograph a base map was constructed, which was verified on the ground; on this base the contour lines were added by instrumental survey. Scale, 1:20,000.

{54}

Fig. 39—Schoolcraft, Mich., a town typical of the agricultural portions of the north-central United States, showing the characteristic features—roads, fields, town blocks, and others—by which the aviator can recognize a locality from a distance. The mottled appearance of the land surrounding the village is characteristic of air photographs of glacial moraine regions. The picture of the village itself might be taken as a prototype of the American village with its fairly regular layout of streets, its business center indicated by a few larger roofs along the widest street, its lawns, trees, and gardens, the bordering farm lands, and the scattered extensions of the village into points in the direction of the main roads. Scale, about 1:14,000.

{55}

### The Glacial Drift Plain

Fig. 40—Map of the town of Schoolcraft, Mich., for comparison with Fig. 39. Enlarged from the advance edition, 1:48,000, of the Schoolcraft, Mich., topographic sheet to be published by the U. S. Geological Survey. Scale, 1:14,000.

Some of the characteristics of a third type of plain, the glacial drift plain, are shown in Figures 37 to 41. Here are pictured glacial lakes, bogs, marshes, moraines, and outwash plains, peat-filled depressions, kettleholes and gullied slopes—typical features of a glaciated region. The views show, also, many of the{56} familiar aspects of the central and western parts of the United States: the rectangular pattern formed by the land subdivisions established by the United States Land Office, the checkerboard pattern being emphasized by the section-line roads; the minor subdivisions into fields; and the cultivation of a variety of crops.

Fig. 41—Kettleholes and other depressions in glacial till, on the Grand Trunk Railway about 5 miles southwest of Schoolcraft, Mich. The distance between the eastern (right) edge of this view and the western (left) of Fig. 37 is about 1 mile. Scale, about 1:15,000.

These photographs were selected from a series taken as an experiment in map-making. In June, 1920, the United States Air Service sent a plane equipped with a K-1 camera from Dayton, Ohio, to Schoolcraft, Mich, where in seven hours’ flying time a fifteen-minute quadrangle, about 220 square miles, was photographed. The prints were matched together and reduced to a scale of 1:48,000. From them such features as roads, streams, forests, land corners, etc., were transferred to plane-table sheets, which the topographic engineers on the ground then used for contouring the relief. Figure 38 is a part of the preliminary proof of this map. It may be added that the experiment is regarded as highly favorable to the use of the airplane camera as an instrument in mapping.{57}

## CHAPTER X
MOUNTAIN FEATURES
(Figs. 42 to 52)

In obtaining photographic illustrations from the ground of mountains, canyons, and associated land forms, the same difficulty, but in exaggerated form, is encountered that obtains in securing an advantageous point of view for small objects. The difficulty is overcome in large measure by the use of aircraft. In an airplane the observer can rise above the obstructions which interfere with the view desired; can look an isolated mountain peak squarely in the face, as in the case of the photograph of Mt. Shasta (Fig. 42); can study the details of its ice cap (Fig. 42) and gaze downward on the lateral and recessional moraines left by the retreat of the mountain’s glaciers (Fig. 43). Few volcanic craters, occurring as they do at the top of cones, have been successfully photographed unless some higher mountain stands near-by on which a favorable viewpoint can be found. From an airplane, however, one can look into the very throat of a crater, as into that of Cinder Cone (Fig. 48), near Lassen Peak, California.

Much attention has been given to the interrelations of canyons, gorges, and mountain ridges, but these relations have hitherto been illustrated chiefly by means of maps and charts. Figures 49, 50, and 52 picture three relations more expressively than any map. To the experienced geographer a map may illustrate perfectly the action of a stream working headward into higher land; but the student to whom the conception of headward erosion is new will certainly grasp the idea more readily from the picture presented in Figure 52. No map could give so clear a conception of a maturely dissected highland as does a photograph like that of the Santa Monica Mountains (Fig. 50).{58}

Fig. 42—A glaciated volcanic Cone: Mt. Shasta, California, 14,162 feet high, as seen by an airplane observer from the northeast, showing Hotlum Glacier in the foreground and Wintun Glacier at the extreme left. The monadnock which separates the two main lobes of Hotlum Glacier appears as the dark-colored mass of rock in the midst of the ice. To be noted are the many indications of movement in the glaciers shown by curved lines, eddies, and crevasses, and the glacial streams flowing away from the ends of the glaciers. The long lobe at the left center shows the formation of both lateral and recessional as well as terminal moraines.

{59}

Fig. 43—A glacial gorge on the northeastern face of Mt. Shasta, California, below Hotlum Glacier (see Fig. 42), the lower end of which is to be seen in the upper part of the photograph. At the left are two ridges, one the edge of a sheet of flow lava, the other, in part at least, a lateral moraine. In the center, at the bottom of the gorge, between the two white lines which represent glacial streams, is a system of concentric ridges which are probably recessional moraines. At the right is the western slope of the gorge. (This figure is the lower overlapping continuation of Fig. 42.)

{60}

Fig. 44—Yosemite Valley, California, a typical ice-shaped gorge, showing at the left the granite face of El Capitan, about 3,000 feet above the bottom of the famous gorge, and, at the right, the pinnacle of Sentinel Rock and the well-known form of Half Dome. At the sky line in the center of the picture is Clouds Rest, and well down in the gorge Washington Column and the Royal Arches can be distinguished.

{61}

These photographs have the advantage of appealing to the mind through the sense of vision and will serve the same purpose as plaster models. Thus, in Figure 52, a variety of topographic forms are to be distinguished, including slightly dissected highlands with sharply incised gorges; maturely dissected highlands made up now of canyons and ridges; a mountain valley broadening out toward an intermontane plain; several arroyos; and many minor features.

In the interpretation of the features shown in a vertical view of a mountainous country the orientation of the photograph is of prime importance. When viewed in proper orientation, that is, as already pointed out (p. 5), with the shadows falling toward the observer, mountains and valleys appear in their correct relation. But, if the position of the picture is reversed, a mountain will look like a depression and a valley like a ridge. This reversal of the image can be tested by looking at Figures 49 or 52 from both viewpoints. However, since the vertical photographs will be compared with maps of the same area, it is thought better to place them on the page as if they were maps. In order to make them appear natural the prints can be turned in the necessary direction.

Fig. 45—Map of the Yosemite Valley, showing the area included within the angle of vision of Fig. 44. The map, a reduced section from the Yosemite and Mt. Lyell, Cal., topographic sheets, 1:125,000, published by the U. S. Geological Survey, is oriented for direct comparison with the photograph. Scale, 1:167,000.

{62}

Fig. 46—Mountains of volcanic origin: Cinder Cone with, in the distance at the right, Lassen Peak in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, as seen from an airplane over Lake Bidwell. Beyond the lake appears the rough surface of lava poured out as molten rock less than two hundred years ago (see U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 79, 1891). Surrounding the cone is a light-colored ash field, sparsely forested at the right, which was formed about two hundred years ago. The mountain in the middle of the photograph having a smooth surface is Cinder Cone, rising 640 feet above the general level of the ash field and consisting of fragments of lava—the so-called ash and cinders—blown from the crater at times of eruption.

{63}

Fig. 47—Map of the region between Cinder Cone and Lassen Peak in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, showing the area included within the angle of vision of Fig. 46. The map, a reduced section from the Lassen Peak, Cal., topographic sheet, 1:250,000, published by the U. S. Geological Survey, is oriented for direct comparison with the photograph. Scale, 1:307,000.

{64}

Fig. 48—The top of Cinder Cone, looking from an airplane down into the crater, showing a large saucer-shaped crater 750 feet across, with a deeper crater formed at the time of a later volcanic explosion, which looks like a cup in the middle of the saucer and extends to a depth of 240 feet below the outer rim. On the barren cinder slopes at the right is the pathway by which the crater can be reached.

{65}

Fig. 49—Mountain, valley, and plain in the Simi Hills about 15 miles northwest of Santa Monica, Cal. (see Calabasas, Cal., topographic sheet), showing, in the right center of the picture, headward erosion from two parallel valleys, in strong contrast with the gently rounded, slightly dissected part of the mountain (left center) into which the streams have not yet eaten their way. Farther up the mountain is more maturely dissected and the divides are narrow and steep. On its top the mountain shows little effect of stream erosion (right). Strongly cut gorges and arroyos appear where the streams enter the plain (left). Probably north is at the bottom of the photograph. Scale, probably about 1:20,000.

{66}

Fig. 50—A maturely dissected highland: Santa Monica Mountains north of Santa Monica, Cal., as photographed from a height of nearly 10,000 feet at a midday in January, 1919. The light-colored irregular line at the left is Sepulveda Canyon; and the similar line at the right, Stone Canyon (for location, see Fig. 51). These mountains rise nearly 1,600 feet above sea level and about 700 feet above the bottom of the canyons.

To obtain the proper impression of ridges and valleys the figure should be reversed. Such photographs as this of the actual ground can hardly be distinguished from photographs of good relief models; they strikingly confirm the correctness of this and similar methods of representing relief on maps, developed intuitively, as it were, such as the Swiss school of hill shading. Scale, about 1:17,000.

{67}

Fig. 51—Map of the region between the center of Los Angeles and Santa Monica, Cal., showing the location of the area covered in Fig. 50 (the double-ruled rectangle in the upper left corner). Reduced from the Santa Monica, Cal., sheet, 1:62,500, of the “Progressive Military Map” of the United States being published by the Corps of Engineers, U.S.A. This sheet, which is the equivalent of the Santa Monica topographic sheet surveyed in 1893 and published by the U.S. Geological Survey, was revised in 1920 by airplane photography. A comparison of the 1893 and 1920 editions brings out strikingly the rapid urban development in this region. Scale, 1:123,000.

{68}

Fig. 52—A young mountain gorge showing an erosional hollow developing headward into the less deeply eroded highlands: San Joaquin Hills, a coastal range in Southern California about 45 miles southeast of Los Angeles, near the mouth of Aliso Creek. North is at the left (see Corona, Cal., topographic sheet). Scale, probably about 1:10,000.

{69}

## CHAPTER XI
AIR CRAFT IN THE STUDY OF ROCKS AND ORES
(Fig. 53)

The admirable manner in which air photography lends itself to the observation of geographic relations and physiographic processes suggests its use as a valuable addition to the instruments of geologic reconnaissance; for, not only is the study of geology inseparable from that of physiography, but, in large measure, geology is applied physical geography and many conclusions of a geologic nature are drawn from observed surface relations.

Probably, in most cases, the actual character and composition of rocks cannot be determined from air photographs; but, just as on a good map an area of crystalline rocks can be distinguished from one of sedimentary rocks by means of the topographic expression, so areas of different rocks can be distinguished on photographs. For instance, an area of upturned sedimentary rocks would be readily distinguished from one of horizontal rocks. Figure 42 shows how the character of glaciated mountains is revealed, and Figures 37 to 41 of the Michigan area show well the familiar features of continental glaciation.

It is perhaps premature to say much of the use of the airplane in the study of geology until it has been thoroughly tested. But it should be possible from the air to locate and map ore bodies, metalliferous veins, and outcrops of rock: for it is well known that rocks at the outcrop differ in color, in the forms of erosion developed in them, and in the kind of plants which they support. It is of interest that Colonel Alfred H. Brooks, who was Chief Geologist of the American Expeditionary Forces in France during the war, found that geologic boundaries could be recognized on air photographs and that by means of these photographs he could correct existing geologic maps and identify{70}

Fig. 53—Canyon in sedimentary rocks near the mouth of the Pecos River, Texas. The rocks consist of flat-lying strata, and the tortuous lines resembling the grain in wood denote the outcrops of hard layers and the benches formed on these layers by erosion. This photograph illustrates the use of air photography in geological reconnaissance. Scale not known.

{71}

formations in inaccessible areas within the enemy lines. His method was to use air photographs in the study of the geologic formations of areas accessible to him. Then, having familiarized himself with the appearance of the different rock formations and structures on the photographs, he was able to recognize the same features on photographs of areas held by the enemy and so project his mapping over into inaccessible territory.[4]

The prospector should effect a great saving of time by using air photographs to guide him to places where he can find exposures of rock and to help him to avoid places where it would be useless to look for exposures. Particularly in wooded regions air photographs are valuable in indicating localities where exposures can be found in areas so covered with forest that examination on the ground would not be worthy of consideration. Prospectors for oil are planning to use airplanes for this purpose in northern Canada, in South America, and in other places where much of the country is so densely wooded that much time is usually spent in looking for clear space.

### Use in Exploration

Exploratory work should benefit in many ways. General reconnaissance has been carried on to a considerable extent in foreign lands with airplanes and to some extent also in America. Wide areas along the Mexican border have been photographed for the making of new maps and for the correction of existing maps. The same photographs would be useful in geologic reconnaissance. The new photographs of southern Arizona are said to show mountain ranges many miles away from their location on existing maps. Such corrections are of importance to the geologist as well as to the geographer and the map-maker. Amundsen intends to employ several small planes in his Arctic work now under way. Mjöberg[5] has projected an expedition to New Guinea in which the use of airplanes is a fundamental condition.{72}

## CHAPTER XII
MAPPING AND CHARTING FROM THE AIR
(Figs. 54 to 82)

Mention has already been made (p. 56) of the experiment in map-making carried out by the Army Air Service and the United States Geological Survey at Schoolcraft, Mich. The results of that experiment and of others of the sort are sufficient to establish the fact that the air camera is destined to become a valuable addition to the map-maker’s equipment. The extent to which it will be used depends, of course, upon the degree to which its present imperfections are corrected and its possibilities developed. The Board of Surveys and Maps of the United States government has recently published the results of its study of air photography for use in map-making.[6]

Fig. 54—View across the western end of Lake Erie, looking in a northeasterly direction (see Fig. 55). Oblique photograph taken from 18,000 feet above Port Clinton, Ohio, by Lieut. G. W. Goddard, showing, in the foreground at the right, Catawba “Island,” a part of the mainland, and, at the left, Put-in-Bay and the islands around it. In the distance below the white clouds are a small island (Middle Island) and a large one (Pelee Island). In the upper left-hand corner is seen Point Pelee and the Canadian shore to the northeast of it about 30 miles away. At Put-in-Bay was fought, September 10, 1813, the Battle of Lake Erie, in which Commodore Perry defeated the British. The monument commemorating this victory can be distinguished in the photograph as a white shaft.

Although most vertical airplane photographs are in the nature of large-scale maps, this view illustrates how a large area can be covered in an oblique view taken at a high altitude—an area, when transformed, of appreciable size even on a small-scale map, such as, for example, Fig. 55.

Fig. 55—Map of the western end of Lake Erie showing the area covered within the angle of vision of Fig. 54. Scale, 1:1,400,000.

Figs. 54 (upper) and 55 (lower). For explanation, see bottom of opposite page.

{73}

{74}

### Scale and Horizontal Control Of Vertical Photographs

The vertical photographs taken with an air camera are, of course, of the order of large-scale maps.[7] For a lens of 6-inch focus the scale at an elevation of 2,500 feet will be 1:5,000; at 5,000 feet, 1:10,000; and at 10,000 feet, 1:20,000.[8] Air mapping, therefore, lends itself best to the production of such maps as engineering maps, city plans, topographic maps, and coast charts. In all of these maps a degree of accuracy is demanded that will give the exact location of all the features included on the map and permit the precise measurement of distances between them. To obtain such accuracy necessitates an elaborate system of control stations as a basis on which the surveyor works out his triangulations and traverses. In the United States these controls have been established principally by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey.[9] To construct a map from air photographs, varying in scale and distorted as they often are because of the impossibility of holding the plane at an absolute level and because of the stretching or shrinkage of the photographic paper, would require a great amount of triangulation and traverse in order that the control might be sufficiently detailed to permit the accurate mounting of the photographic prints. But, given these controls, the air camera can, without further adaptation, supply details that heretofore required the laborious processes of plane-table mapping. The topographer can place the two-dimensional details from photographs and then go into the field with only the contouring to be done.

Fig. 56

Fig. 57

{75}

Fig. 58—Index map showing the location of the areas shown on airplane photographs in this book within the Atlantic seaboard of the northeastern United States, except those whose exact location is unknown (Figs. 21, 23, 28, 29, and 77). Scale, 1:2,800,000.

{76}

Fig. 59—An area where charting of the coast line is difficult: Marshlands on Chesapeake Bay which are exposed at low tide and submerged at high tide. Location: South of the mouth of the York River, Virginia, between the estuaries of Poquoson River and Back River. Scale, about 1:2,500.

{77}

Fig. 60—Beach and bluff: Left shore of the York River north-northwest of Gloucester Point, Va., showing a tied island (one of the Mumfort Islands) and a narrow band of beach between the water and the bluff, which is 20 to 50 feet above the water. The plain back of the bluff is recognized by the checkered pattern made by the cultivated fields. Scale, about 1:9,000.

{78}

Fig. 61—A sandy beach with beach cusps forming the extreme northwestern end of Sandy Hook, New Jersey, showing, at the left, the end of the Hook surrounded by light-colored sand shading off to shoals and bars; at the right, a broad belt of sand where a new point is beginning to form; and, between them, six cusps arranged like saw teeth. Note that a wave breaks into foam at the point of each cusp. Scale, about 1:9,000.

{79}

### Use in City Mapping

In city mapping, even though time be taken to establish a very elaborate system of controls, the air camera can accomplish in a few hours a task of years by ordinary methods. In fact it is only by means of air photographs that maps of a growing city can be kept at all up to date. Paris was mapped with 800 plates in less than one day of actual flying. Washington was completely mapped in two and a half hours with less than 200 exposures.[10] For the mosaic of Rochester, N. Y. (Fig. 56) 82 photographs were made in one hour and twenty minutes. There is no reason why such a mosaic with an original survey or even a number of accurately located points as a basis of control should not be sufficiently accurate for all purposes.

### Use in Revision of Existing Maps

Another immediate use of air photographs in mapping is in the correction and revision of existing maps. So far as individual features are concerned, the air photograph is an exact record of the area exposed to its lens, and natural and artificial features are easily transferred from the picture to the map. Its great value in the saving of time and money has been demonstrated in the rapidly developing territory near Los Angeles. In 1893 the Santa Monica quadrangle was surveyed, and houses, roads, etc., as they existed at that time, are shown on the map. This area was later built up and so changed that the map was practically worthless. From information derived from air photographs the map was revised in 1920 (Fig. 51). Evidence has already been given of the efficiency of the air photograph in elaborating maps where the importance of the region is not sufficient to warrant the expense of a detailed survey of minor features, and in mapping areas inaccessible from the ground.{80}

Fig. 62—Beach cusps extended under water and showing the interference of waves off the curved beach on the bay side north of Beach Haven, N. J. Scale, about 1:3,000.

{81}

Fig. 63—First stage in the formation of an inlet through a barrier beach, where ocean waves during some storm, probably at high tide, broke over the sand barrier 2 miles north of Beach Haven, N. J., and washed some of its sand into Little Egg Harbor. (For another good example of wash-overs, see Fig. 68.) Scale, about 1:9,000.

{82}

Fig. 64—A tidal delta in Shark River Inlet, Belmar, N. J., as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet, showing shoals at the left, which appear shadowy because they are under water, and the small channels which radiate outward from the narrow inlet like the ribs of a fan. They are the distributaries of this underwater delta. Scale, about 1:11,000.

{83}

### Use in Coast Charting

Fig. 65—A tidal delta built up until it is partly above water: Popes Creek, Virginia, on the right bank of the lower Potomac River, 4 miles southeast of Colonial Beach, as seen obliquely from a height of 4,000 feet at 3:30 P.M., August 31, 1920. The tidal currents from the Potomac have built hook-shaped bars nearly across the outlet of the creek, and the inflowing currents have built a delta from the mouth of the creek upstream.

It is fortunate for those engaged in the study of shore features and the mapping of coasts that, being flat, shore features are particularly well adapted to representation by air photographs, for on coasts exposed to the wind and waves the channels, shoals and bars are continually changing. Air photography offers a quick and convenient means of keeping charts up to date. The intricacies of the water line in some places makes accurate charting by the ordinary survey methods a slow, laborious process. When bluffs or relatively steep slopes, like those of York River, Virginia, near Gloucester Point, shown in Figure 60,{84}

Fig. 66—A double tidal delta at Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet. To the east (right) the breaking waves and shadowy depths indicate the position of shoals. West of the surf belt are the light-colored beach sand, shading off from the conspicuous hook at the southern end of Island Beach into underwater shoals and bars, and older surfaces made dark-colored by the growth of plants. South of the hook are the inlet leading into Barnegat Bay and the northern end of Long Beach, at the point of which stands a lighthouse whose long shadow is to be seen across the beach sand. The mottled appearance of the bay to the left is due to shoals slightly submerged or perhaps exposed at low tide, where dark-colored drainage lines appear, and shading off to deeper water, where the submerged land forms have a shadowy appearance. The distribution of the shoals indicates that this is a double tidal delta, an infacing part west of the inlet and an ocean-facing part to the right. Scale, about 1:17,000.

{85}

Fig. 67 Fig. 67—A tidal inlet through the barrier beach south of Beach Haven, N. J., connecting the Atlantic Ocean to the right (east) with Little Egg Harbor to the left. The beach sand south of the inlet is little above water level and is frequently washed by waves, which shift the sand and produce the clouded appearance of the sandy surface. The light-colored ragged belt at the right is surf; the continuous narrow belt, beach sand; the clouded areas, recently washed wet or slightly submerged sand. (The ordinary tidal variation here is 4.2 feet.) This inlet does not appear on the 1914 edition of U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1216, and sand hooks had little more than begun to form then. Scale, about 1:14,000.

{86}

Fig. 68—Beach between Brigantine and Little Egg Inlets, New Jersey, showing a variety of features characteristic of a wave-built sand barrier. The upper (northern) part of the illustration shows several places where waves have broken over the sand barrier and washed the sand westward, where it was redeposited at the left in the quiet, protected water. Farther south are older wash-overs, where the enclosed bay is nearly filled with sand. At the left are numerous islands, streams, and flats characteristic of the salt marshes west of the barrier beach along the New Jersey coast. Scale, about 1:7,000.

{87}

Fig. 68—Beach between Brigantine and Little Egg Inlets, New Jersey, showing a variety of features characteristic of a wave-built sand barrier. The upper (northern) part of the illustration shows several places where waves have broken over the sand barrier and washed the sand westward, where it was redeposited at the left in the quiet, protected water. Farther south are older wash-overs, where the enclosed bay is nearly filled with sand. At the left are numerous islands, streams, and flats characteristic of the salt marshes west of the barrier beach along the New Jersey coast. Scale, about 1:7,000.

Fig. 69—A simple spit: Lower Cedar Point, Maryland, on the left bank of the lower Potomac River, 6 miles north of Colonial Beach, Va., as seen obliquely downward from a height of 4,000 feet. The white line on either side of the point is sand at the foot of bluffs. Houses and fields are seen at the left.

occur along the shore, the water line varies little from year to year. But on very low lands, like those along Chesapeake Bay south of the mouth of York River, shown in Figure 59, the strand may migrate over a broad belt between high and low tide. For this reason it is desirable that photographs of areas affected by the tide be accompanied by a record of the date and time of day at which the exposure was made, in order that the height of the tide at the time of exposure can be computed. As the shore on the Coast and Geodetic Survey charts denotes the water line at high tide, a photograph taken at low tide might be interpreted as indicating an error on the chart. Where the water migrates over such a broad belt of sand or mud, the prob{88}lems of charting become very troublesome. Photographs of such areas could be taken at both low and high tide, and from these the belt of daily flooding could be charted.

Fig. 70—A hook, or recurved spit, south of Brigantine Inlet, New Jersey, as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet, showing the strong curving upstream characteristic of spits on this ocean-facing coast. The growing end of the spit, resembling a lily bud, shows an underwater extension beyond the light-colored beach sand. To be noted is the filling in of the lagoon behind the reef and its pools and drainage lines. This figure is practically a southern continuation of Fig. 68. Scale, about 1:9.000.

### Experiments by the United States, French, And Other Coast Surveys

The use of photographs in charting the coast line was tested by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey.[11] A flight was{89}

Fig. 71—A hook, or recurved spit, showing interference with natural growth: The northern end of Ocean City. N. J., as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet. At the right (east) appears the curved body of sand, light-colored where dried, darker-colored where bathed by the waves and fringed by surf. To the left certain “improvements” seem to have interfered with the natural growth of the spit, and a small bay of shallow water has been enclosed by the formation of a bay-mouth bar across the outlet to the north. Scale, about 1:14,000.

made over the coast of New Jersey by Captain A. W. Stevens of the United States Army Air Service, March 20, 1920, in a plane equipped with a K-1 camera of 10-inch focal length, which makes negatives 18 by 24 centimeters in size. During the flight the camera was maintained at an altitude of about 10,000 feet. The course was covered by 183 exposures made at such intervals of time that the prints overlap. Unfortunately the exposures were not sufficient to give all the details desired for marsh and water areas, but prints were made on developing paper suitable for showing extreme contrast. These were matched together and a continuous picture obtained. A part{90}

Fig. 72—New Point Comfort, a complex recurved spit at the tip of the peninsula enclosed by the York and Rappahannock Rivers, Virginia. A vertical view taken from an altitude of about 10,000 feet, showing in order from right to left (east to west): the wavy surface of Chesapeake Bay; a light-colored band of beach sand curving westward in a compound hook made dark-colored in some places by trees and brush; a shallow bay west of the beach in which may be seen shoals, channels, and sand bars under water; and low-lying areas showing woodland and cultivated fields. The photograph was taken at a time of day when reflected light from the partly enclosed body of water was dispersed, allowing the submerged forms to appear. Scale, about 1:12,000.

{91}

Fig. 73—Lines of growth in a sand spit: Tucker Beach, New Jersey, as photographed from a height of 10,000 feet, showing the growth southward by successive ridges, which probably began as sand bars, grew to be barriers by wave action, were heightened by wind-blown sand, and finally were added to the main body of the spit by the final filling of the enclosed lagoons. To the right (east) is the Atlantic Ocean, showing waves and surf near the light-colored beach sand. Farther to the left are the ridges of sand made dark-colored by vegetation, bordered by light-colored beach sand on Little Egg Inlet, which appears to the south and west. Scale, about 1:14,000.

{92}

of this picture, greatly reduced, is reproduced as Figure 22. Several characteristic shore and salt marsh features are illustrated by this series of photographs, and these are reproduced in separate figures together with illustrations of special features in other places.

Fig. 74—An island developing toward the stage of being tied to the mainland by a double tombolo, or connecting bar: Napatree Point, as photographed from a height of about 10,000 feet, connected to the east by Napatree Beach with the mainland at Watch Hill, R. I., and approaching connection to the north with the mainland near Stonington, Conn. On the outer side of the tombolos underwater shoals and bars are seen dimly at the right (south, Block Island Sound side) and more clearly at the left (west, Fishers Island Sound), where the boat landing is situated at the edge of a submerged shelf. The surf appears as a thin white line, the beach sand as a narrow light-colored belt, and the higher land as dark-colored areas on which houses and other structures stand. Scale, about 1:24,000.

The main features illustrated in detail, all of which are continually liable to change, making the keeping of a map of the area at all up to date impossible by ordinary means, are as follows: coast of low-lying mainland (Fig. 60); mud or peat-covered beach (Fig. 59); sandy beach (Fig. 63); barrier beach (Fig. 67);{93} beach cusps (Figs. 61 and 62); recurved spits or sand hooks (Fig. 70 and others); compound hook (Fig. 72); lines of growth in the development of hooks (Figs. 73); tombolos and tied islands (Figs. 60 and 74).

Fig. 75—Oblique view of the mouth of Powells Creek, Virginia, on the right bank of the lower Potomac River, 5 miles west of the Naval Proving Grounds at Indian Head, showing at the left the inner channel winding through the slightly submerged shoals and fading out toward the right where the channel crosses the submerged terrace of the Potomac.

Another experiment was made by the Coast and Geodetic Survey off the coast of Florida, where the water is clear, in an attempt to photograph “the small coral heads and pinnacle rocks” which may be disastrous to boats. The report states that the results were unsatisfactory and concludes that airplane pictures are useful in “aerial photo-topography” but not in{94}

Fig. 76—Channels, shoals, and terraces in a drowned river valley: Roberts Creek, 9 miles southeast of Yorktown, Va., an estuary tributary to Chesapeake Bay. Under the water in the drowned valley is seen the channel, “braided” in some places, and extending out through sand bars to the deep water of Poquoson River shown at the top (north) of the illustration. At the left the dark-colored forest area is fringed with a narrow strip of white beach sand, then with a belt of shallow water at the outer edge of which the waves form an irregular white line, and beyond this with a belt which represents a submerged terrace. Scale, about 1:14,000.

{95}

Fig. 77—The underwater channel in Quantico Bay. Quantico Creek is a tributary of the Potomac River entering from the Virginia side, about 28 miles downstream from Washington. The “Bay” is the widened part of the stream at its entrance into the Potomac, which is entered by the tide. Forested land appears at the right and left, with light-colored fields at the left. The space between the wooded areas is occupied by shallow water, beneath which appears the relatively deep channel, which forks after the manner of streams. The branching channel is wholly under water and differs in some respects from the channel of a normal stream. Among the more obvious peculiarities is the “fanning out,” of the headwaters. Photograph taken from a height of about 18,000 feet. Scale, about 1:21,000.

{96}

Fig. 78—Natural channels and shoals near Miami, Fla.: an oblique view eastward to the ocean across Bear’s Cut, which is situated between Biscayne Key and Virginia Key. Because of the greater depth of water, the channels with a maximum depth of 17 feet appear darker than the shoals. The photograph was taken at a height of 3,000 feet, April 20, 1918.

{97}

Fig. 79—A dredged channel at Miami, Fla.: an oblique photograph showing part of the city, the boat landing, the sandy beach, and the shallow water, through which a straight ship channel has been cut, which appears dark-colored in the illustration because of the greater depth of water. The photograph was taken April 22, 1918, from 21 height of 3,000 feet.

{98}

Fig. 80—A shoal in Hereford Inlet north of Wildwood, N. J., as seen from a height of 10,000 feet. The breaking waves indicate that the shoal is only slightly submerged. (Tidal variation is here about 4 feet.) The sand spit north of the shoal, the south end of Sevenmile Beach, like other spits of the New Jersey coast, is building southward and may in time annex the shoal. Scale, about 1:13,000.

{99}

Fig. 81—Sand bars at Cape Charles, Va. South of the town at the right is the harbor, into which a tug-boat is towing a barge. West of the town (left) is a belt of light-colored beach sand and sand bars ending at the south against the breakwater, north of the harbor. The sand bars appear somewhat dim because they were photographed through water. They are under water 1 to 6 feet deep at low tide, or 4 to 9 feet at high tide. Scale, about 1:6,000.

“aerial photo-hydrography.”[12] On the other hand, Volmat reports the successful use of air photography for similar purposes on the French coast, where photographs of objects down to a depth of 17 meters (about 56 feet) were found useful in several ways—among others, the discovery of points of rock which had{100}

Fig. 82—Bars, channels, beaches, and marsh near Far Rockaway, Long Island, N. Y., as photographed from a height of 7,000 feet at 11 A.M., September 15, 1920. In order from the bottom of the picture upward are: East Rockaway Inlet with a shoal to the left and the sand hook at the end of Long Beach to the right of it; the beach south of Far Rockaway with streets and houses; a group of boats in the inlet at the right of the beach; an area of salt marsh that is filling the lagoon behind the barrier beach; and a small section of the village of Far Rockaway. Scale, about 1:12,000.

{101}

escaped attention during very detailed surveys. He states that with proper plates and ray filters the presence of objects invisible to the eye is revealed by the camera.[13] Similar use of air photographs has been made by the English in charting reefs, shallows, and harbors. Thomas says: “In 1917 aeroplane photography was successfully used for charting the harbor of Rahbeg on the Arabian coast.”[14] It is a well-known fact that, under proper conditions, objects submerged to a considerable depth under clear water can be seen from points high above the surface. During the war, submarines were detected and followed by observers in airplanes, and sunken vessels, mines, and other submerged objects have been located by observation from the air. Illustrations in this paper show the possibility of using this method of observation, to some extent at least, in detecting and mapping shoals, channels, and other features under water.

Photographs of channels like those of the Potomac River and its tributaries will be commercially as well as scientifically valuable. The deep-water channel of the Potomac is well known and has been charted; but very little is known of many of the small tributary channels, such as that of Powells Creek (Fig. 75). Where the channels are not well known, such a photograph could be used to advantage in avoiding the shoals, and, by surveyors, first in exploratory work and later as a general guide in charting. Small boats entering this channel could use the photographs either for the original location of the deep channel in case no chart were available or for detecting changes in its course after the chart was made. For uncharted channels, like those of many of the tributaries of the Potomac River, air{102} photography furnishes a quick and accurate means of location.

No amount of sounding, charting, or description could produce so accurate a mental picture of a drowned valley as that produced by Figure 76. In Figures 78 and 79, both of which were taken near Miami, Florida, is illustrated the difference in appearance between natural and artificial channels. The straightaway course and regular outlines of the dredged channel contrast sharply with the winding course and merging outlines of the natural channel. To the student of physiography and earth history the photographs furnish a means of observation of a definiteness heretofore quite unthought-of. On them the actual shape of the channels, submerged terraces, and drowned land forms are shown in detail.

### Improvements Under Way Point to Promising Outlook for Airplane Photography

There is, however, need of careful research to determine the conditions under which the best results can be obtained. The height and time of day for exposures with a certain lens, the emulsion and kind of ray filter best suited under certain conditions, the effect of light as it enters and emerges from the water, and the effect of polarization are subjects demanding consideration. Chief among the experiments now under way is the determination of the kind of emulsion and ray filter or color screen that will give the best results. It is a demonstrated fact that, with an emulsion sensitive to red light, objects in the air invisible to the eye because of intervening haze can be photographed through a red filter. It is possible that water can be penetrated in the same way and that filters of other colors will prove advantageous.

Certainly, the air photograph is only in its infancy—but an infancy full of promise. As a means of securing new and advantageous views of subjects of interest, it is not only entertaining{103} but scientifically and commercially valuable. As an aid in mapping it can, even in its present stage of development, serve an important purpose by supplying accurate knowledge of otherwise inaccessible regions, by furnishing details that are valuable but expensive to obtain, and by permitting the frequent and inexpensive revision of existing maps.{105}{104}

## INDEX

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, Y.

Accuracy, 1, 74
Acknowledgments, viii, xi
Aerial photo-hydrography, 99
Aerial photo-topography, 93
Air photographs, how to read, 4;
improvements under way, 102;
oblique and vertical, 1;
value in coast charting, 93, 99, 101
Air photography, application, ix;
development, ix;
elements to be recorded, 2;
outlook, 102
Air Services, co-operation, xi
Aircraft, x
Airplane photography. See Air photography
Aliso Creek, California, 68
Amundsen, Roald, 71
Anacostia flats, D. C., 12
Anacostia River, 13, 22 (ill.);
land along, mosaic photograph, opp. 32 (Fig. 13)
Animal trails, 29, 39
Annapolis, 7. See also United States Naval Academy
Arabian coast, 101
Architects, 7, 11
Architecture, 11
Arizona, southern, 71
Arroyos, 61, 65 (ill.)
Atlantic City, N. J., 32 (ill.)
Atlantic Coastal Plain, 27;
meandering streams, 50;
salt marsh areas, 32 (ill.);
submarine land forms, 45
Atlantic Ocean, waves and surf, 91 (ill.)
Back River, Virginia, 76
Bagley, J. W., xii, 74
Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad bridge, 9 (ill.), 10
Barnegat Bay, 85
Barnegat Inlet, 84 (ill.), 85
Barrier beaches, 41;
between Brigantine and Little Egg Inlets, New Jersey, 86 (ill.);
cities and surroundings, 32 (ill.);
inlet formation through, 81 (ill.);
Long Branch, N. J., 18 (ill.);
tidal inlet through, Beach Haven, N. J., 85 (ill.).
See also Beaches
Beach Haven, N. J., cusps, 80 (ill.);
inlet formation through barrier beach, 81 (ill.);
tidal inlet, 85 (ill.)
Beaches, bluff and beach on shore of York River, 77 (ill.);
cusps near Beach Haven, 80 (ill.);
Far Rockaway, Long Island, 100 (ill.);
sandy, with cusps—Sandy Hook, 78 (ill.).
See also Barrier beaches
Bear’s Cut, Florida coast, 96 (ill.)
Belmar, N. J., tidal delta, 82 (ill.)
Benning, Camp, opp. 26, opp. 50
Benning, D. C., 13, 22 (ill.)
Benning Road, 13
Benning Road Bridge, opp. 22 (ill. and map)
Bidwell, Lake, California, 62 (ill.), 63 (map)
Bluffs, 83;
beach and bluff on shore of York River, 77 (ill.)
Board of Surveys and Maps, 72
Boundary disputes, 26;
Texas-Oklahoma, 51 (ill.)
Braided channels, 50, 51 (ill.)
Brigantine Inlet, New Jersey, 86 (ill.), 87;
recurved spit, 88 (ill.)
Bridges, 11;
Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad, 9 (ill.), 10;
Benning Road, opp. 22 (ill. and map);
Hell Gate, 11, 15 (ill.);
Pennsylvania Avenue, opp. 22 (ill. and map)
Bronx Borough, Port Morris section, 15 (ill.)
Bronx Kill, 15 (ill.)
Brooks, A. H., 69, 71
Buildings, construction records, 11;
pictures from a new angle, 7
Calabasas, Cal., topographic sheet, 65
Cameras, adaptation, 2;
automatic data records, 2;
construction experiments, 35;
Eastman mapping, recording symbols, 2, 3 (ill.);
faithfulness, 23, 26;
human eye and, 5, 101;
panoramic, xii;
stereoscopic, 6;
use, x;
use in map-making, 72;
value in coast charting, 93, 99, 101
Camouflage, 5, 6
Camp Benning, Ga., opp. 26, opp. 50
Canyons, 57;
Pecos River, 70 (ill.);
Santa Monica Mountains, 66 (ill.), 67 (map)
Cape Charles, Virginia, 43;
sand bars, 99 (ill.)
Capitol, National, frontispiece, 7
Catawba “Island,” Ohio, 72, 73 (ill. and map)
Channels, Far Rockaway, Long Island, 100 (ill.);
Miami, Fla, 96 (ill.), 97 (ill.), 102;
Potomac River, tributary, 101;
underwater, 93 (ill.), 94. (ill.), 95 (ill.)
Chanute, Octave, ix
Charting, 72;
coast, 83, 88
Chattahoochee River, opp. 50 (ill. and map)
Cherry Point, Virginia, 46 (ill.), 47 (map)
Chesapeake Bay, xi;
Lambs Creek on, 48 (ill.);
low lands along, 87;
marshlands difficult to chart, 76 (ill.);
wavy surface, 90 (ill.).
Cinder Cone, California, 57, 62 (ill.), 63 (map);
top, 64 (ill.)
City geography, 17 (ill.), opp. 26, 54 (ill.), opp. 74, 79
City planners, 1, 11
City planning, 12 (ill.);
Columbus, Ga., opp. 26 (ill. and map)
Clouds Rest, California, 60 (ill.)
Coast Charting, 83, 88
Coast surveys, experiments in mapping in United States, France, etc., 88
Coastal mud flats. See Mud flats
Colonial Beach, Va., 83, 87
Color screen, 102
Columbus, Ga., opp. 26 (ill. and map);
meanders near, 50, opp. 50 (ill. and map)
Columbus, Ga.-Ala., topographic sheet, opp. 50
Construction records, 11
Controls, 74
Coral islands, 93
Corona, Cal., topographic sheet, 68
Corsons Inlet, New Jersey, 28 (ill.)
Cousaic Marsh, Virginia, 34 (ill.), 35 (map);
details, 31 (ill.)
Craters, 27, 57;
Cinder Cone, California, 62 (ill.), 63 (map), 64 (ill.)
Cusps, Beach Haven, New Jersey, 80 (ill.);
Sandy Hook, 78 (ill.)
Dayton, Ohio, 56
Deanewood, D. C., 13
Deltas, underwater, 33 (ill.), 45, 82 (ill.), 83 (ill.), 84 (ill.), 85 (ill.)
Depressions and elevations, interpreting, 4, 5
District of Columbia, Anacostia flats, 12
Drainage systems, 27;
Lee Marsh, Virginia, 30 (ill.).
See also Marsh drainage
Drowned topography, 45;
terraces at mouth of Piankatank River, 46 (ills.);
valley—Lambs Creek, Virginia, 48 (ill.);
valley—Roberts Creek, Virginia, 94 (ill.), 102
East Rockaway Inlet, Long Island, 100 (ill.)
Eastern Shore of Virginia, 41;
mud-flat area, stream system, 42 (ill.), 43 (ill.)
Eastman mapping camera, opp. 74;
recording symbols, 2, 3 (ill.)
El Capitan, 60 (ill.)
Elevations and depressions, interpreting, 4, 5
Ellipse, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Eltham Marsh, Virginia, 36 (ill.), 37 (map), 39
Emulsions, 102
Engineering, 11;
projects covering large areas, 12, opp. 22 (ill. and map)
Erie, Lake, 72, 73 (ill. and map)
Erosion, headward, 57, 65 (ill.), 68 (ill.)
Everglades, 27
Exploration, 71
Exposure, 102
Eye versus camera, 5, 101
Far Rockaway, Long Island, 100 (ill.)
Filters, 102
Fishing Bay, Virginia, 46 (ill.), 47 (map)
Flats. See Mud flats
Flood plain, 33 (ill.)
Florida coast, channels and shoals near Miami, 96 (ill.), 97 (ill.), 102;
coral heads and pinnacle rocks, 93
Flowerfield, Mich., 52 (ill.), 53 (map)
Forests, 23
Gardens, 12
Genesee River, opp. 74 (ill. and map)
Geologic maps, 69
Geology, 69
Glacial drift plain, 52 (ill.) 55
Glaciers, 57;
glacial gorge, Mt. Shasta, 59 (ill.);
Mt. Shasta, 58 (ill.)
Gloucester Point, Va., 77, 83
Goddard, G. W., 72
Gorges, 57, 61;
Genesee River, opp. 74. (ill. and map);
glacial gorge on Mt. Shasta, 59 (ill.);
San Joaquin Hills, California, 68 (ill.);
Yosemite Valley, 60 (ill.)
Grand Trunk Railway, near Schoolcraft, Mich., 56 (ill.)
Great Plains, 50;
river channel—Red River, 51 (ill.)
Gwynn Island, Virginia, 46 (ill.), 47 (map)
Half Dome, 60 (ill.)
Hampton, Va., small stream near, 33 (ill.)
Headward erosion, 57, 65 (ill.), 68 (ill.)
Hell Gate Bridge, 11, 15 (ill.)
Hereford Inlet, New Jersey, 98 (ill.)
Hill Marsh, Virginia, 34 (ill.), 35 (map), 38
Hooks. See under Spits
Hotlum Glacier, Mt. Shasta, 58 (ill.), 59
Hudson River and West Point, 8 (ill.)
Ice cap, 57
Inclinometer, 2, 3 (ill.)
Index map showing areas photographed, 75
Inlets, formation through barrier beach, 81 (ill.);
Hereford Inlet, New Jersey, 98 (ill.);
River, New Jersey, 82 (ill.);
tidal—Beach Haven, N. J., 85 (ill.)
Introduction, ix
Iroquois, Lake, opp. 74
Islands, tied, 77 (ill.);
at Napatree Point, Rhode Island, 92 (ill.)
Ives, H. E., 6, 79
James River and Mulberry Island, 24 (ill.), 25 (map)
Jones, E. Lester, 74, 88
Jones, John Paul, 7;
mausoleum, 9 (ill.)
Kenilworth, D. C., 13
Kettleholes, 52 (ill.), 53 (map), 55, 56 (ill.)
Kilmarnock, Va., topographic sheet, 47
Lambs Creek, Virginia, 48 (ill.)
Land forms, submerged, 45
Landscape gardeners, 1, 11
Landscape gardening, 11, 12 (ill.), 13 (ill.);
Long Branch, N. J., 18 (ill.)
Langley, S. P., ix
Langley Field, xi
Lassen Peak, 57, 62 (ill.), 63 (map)
Lassen Peak, Cal., topographic sheet, 63
Lava, 62
Lee, Robert E., statue, 12 (ill.)
Lee Marsh, Virginia, 36 (ill.);
details, 30 (ill.)
Library of Congress, 7
Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, 81, 85
Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey, 86 (ill.), 87, 91 (ill.)
Little Hell Gate, 15 (ill.)
Long Beach, Long Island, 100 (ill.)
Long Beach, New Jersey, 84 (ill.), 85
Long Branch, N. J., part, showing barrier beach development, 18 (ill.)
Long Island, East Rockaway Inlet, 100 (ill.);
Far Rockaway bars, channels, beaches, and marsh, 100 (ill.);
Rockaway Beach, 11, 17 (ill.);
Hell Gate Bridge to, 15 (ill.)
Los Angeles, 79;
map of region between Santa Monica and, 67
Lower Cedar Point, Maryland, 87 (ill.)
Ludlam Beach, New Jersey, 28 (ill.)
Map, index of photographed areas, 75
Mapping, city, 79;
from the air, 72
Mapping camera, opp. 22;
experiment with, 53, 56
Maps, air mapping and, 74;
air photograph adjustment, 35;
use of air photographs in revising, 79
Marsh drainage, 27, 29
Marshes, 27;
Chesapeake Bay, difficult to chart, 76 (ill.);
details of drainage, 30 (ill.);
details of frequently submerged, 31 (ill.);
Far Rockaway, Long Island, 100 (ill.);
salt marsh areas of coastal plain, 32 (ill.);
salt marsh features, 92;
stream development in tidal marsh, 28 (ill.)
Mathews, Va., topographic sheet, 47
Mattaponi River, 29, 36, 38
Meanders, 33 (ill.), 38;
abandoned, 50;
Chattahoochee River, opp. 50 (ill. and map);
marsh, 27
Menoher, C. T., xi
Mexican border, 71
Miami, Fla, channels and shoals, 96 (ill.), 102;
dredged channel, 97 (ill.), 102
Michigan, glacial drift plain, 52 (ill.), 53 (map)
Military Academy. See United States Military Academy
Military observation, 4, 6
Mjöberg, Eric, 71
Monument Avenue, Richmond, Va., 12 (ill.)
Moraines, 52 (ill.), 53 (map), 55, 57;
Mt. Shasta, 59 (ill.)
Mosaics, 12, 20, 22 (ill.);
Anacostia River, D. C., land along, opp. 22 (Fig. 13);
Columbus, Ga., opp. 26 (Fig. 17);
Mulberry Island, Virginia, 24 (ill.);
Rochester, N. Y., opp. 74 (ill. and map)
Mountains, 22, 27;
features, 57;
of volcanic origin—Cinder Cone, etc., California, 62 (ill.), 63 (map)
Mud flats, 36;
coastal, 41;
stream channels and, 42 (ill.), 43 (ill.)
Mulberry Island, Virginia, 24 (ill.), 25 (map)
Mumfort Islands, Virginia, 77
Muskrats, 29, 39
Napatree Point, Rhode Island, 92 (ill.)
Naval Academy. See United States Naval Academy
New angles, 7
New Guinea, 7
New Kent, Va., topographic sheet, 27, 35, 37
New Point Comfort, spit, 90 (ill.)
New York Connecting Railroad Bridge. See Hell Gate Bridge
New York Harbor, xi
Newport News, Va., xi, 11;
shipyards, 14 (ill.)
Oblique photographs, 1
Ocean City, N. J., 32 (ill.);
hook, 89 (ill.)
Oil, prospecting for, 71
Ores, 69
Orientation, 61
Oxbows, 33 (ill.), 50
Pamunkey River, 29, 36, 38;
Cousaic Marsh, 31 (ill.);
Eltham Marsh, 36 (ill.), 37 (map):
marshes, 27;
Sweet Hall Marsh, 34 (ill.), 35 (map)
Panchromatic film, opp. 74
Paris, mapping, 79
Pecos River, 70 (ill.)
Pennsylvania Avenue Bridge, 13, opp. 22 (ill. and map)
Perry, Commodore, 72
Photographs, mosaic. See Mosaics
Photography, airplane. See Air photography
Piankatank River, Virginia, drowned terraces at mouth, 46 (ills.)
Pictures from new angles, 7
Plains, glacial drift, 55;
glacial drift, Michigan, 52 (ill.), 53 (map);
photographing from the air, 50
Popes Creek, Virginia, 83 (ill.)
Poquoson River, Virginia, 76, 94 (ill.)
Port Clinton, Ohio, 72, 73 (ill. and map)
Potomac Park, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Potomac River, xi, 16 (ill.);
channels, tributary, 101;
Lower Cedar Point, spit, 87 (ill.);
Popes Creek and, 83 (ill.);
Powells Creek and, 93 (ill.);
Quantico Creek and, 95
Potter, Lieutenant, opp. 74
Powells Creek, Virginia, 93 (ill.), 101
Put-in-Bay, 72, 73 (ill. and map)
Quantico Bay, 95 (ill.)
Quantico Creek, 95 (ill.)
Rahbeg, Arabia, 101
Railroads, 23
Randalls Island, 15 (ill.)
Ray filter, 102
Reconnaissance work, 69, 71
Red River, Texas-Oklahoma, 50, 51 (ill.)
Relief, means for showing, 5;
representation on maps, 66
Revision of maps, 79
Richmond, Va., Monument Ave., etc., 12 (ill.)
Rivers, 22;
Plains—Red River, 50;
miniature system, 33 (ill.)
Roads, 23
Roberts Creek, Virginia, 94 (ill.)
Rochester, N. Y., 2, opp. 74 (ill. and map)
Rochester, N. Y., topographic sheet, opp. 74
Rockaway Beach, Long Island, 11;
part, showing development, 17 (ill.)
Rocks, Florida coast experiment, 93;
sedimentary, 69, 70 (ill.);
study of, 69
Royal Arches, California, 60 (ill.)
San Joaquin Hills, California, 68 (ill.)
Sand bars, 45, 46 (ill.);
Cape Charles, Virginia, 99 (ill.);
Far Rockaway, Long Island, 100 (ill.)
Sandy Hook, N. J., 78 (ill.)
Santa Monica, Cal., 65, 66;
map of region between Los Angeles and, 67
Santa Monica Mountains, 57, 66 (ill.), 67 (map)
Santa Monica, Cal., topographic sheet, 67, 79
Scale in vertical photographs, viii, 74
Schoolcraft, Mich., 54 (ill.), 55 (map), 56, 72;
kettleholes near, 56 (ill.)
Schoolcraft, Mich., topographic sheet, 53, 55
Seashore, 22
Sedge grass, 29, 30, 38
Sentinel Rock, 60 (ill.)
Sepulveda Canyon, California, 66 (ill.), 67 (map)
Sevenmile Beach, New Jersey, spit and shoal, 98 (ill.)
Severn River, Virginia, 7, 9 (ill.)
Shadows, 5, 61
Shark River Inlet, New Jersey, 82 (ill.)
Shasta, Mt., 57, 58 (ill.);
glacial gorge on, 59 (ill.)
Shipyards, 11;
Newport News, 14 (ill.)
Shoals, 45, 84 (ill.), 85, 94 (ill.);
Hereford Inlet, New Jersey, 98 (ill.);
Miami, Fla., 96 (ill.), 97 (ill.), 102
Shore features, 83
Shrubbery, 13 (ill.)
Sierra Nevada Mountains, Cal., 62 (ill.), 63 (map)
Silt, 29, 36, 39
Simi Hills, California, 65 (ill.)
Simons, J. W., Jr., xi
Sky, cloudy and overcast, 49
Spa Creek, Maryland, 7, 9 (ill.)
Spits, lines of growth, Tucker Beach, New Jersey, 91 (ill.);
recurved, 88 (ill.), 89 (ill.), 90 (ill.);
Sevenmile Beach, New Jersey, 98 (ill.);
simple spit, 87 (ill.)
State-War-Navy Building, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Stereoscopic camera, 6
Stevens, A. W., opp. 74, 89
Stone Canyon, California, 66 (ill.), 67 (map)
Stonington, Conn., 92
Stove Point Neck, Virginia, 46 (ill.), 47 (map)
Stream channels and mud flats, 41, 42 (ill.)
Streams, development in tidal marsh, 28 (ill.)
See also Rivers
Submarine geography, 45
Submarines, 101
Submerged land forms, 45
Submerged objects, detection, 101
Sunken mines, 101
Sunlight, 49
Surface, general aspects as seen from the air, 22
Swamps, 27
Sweet Hall Marsh, Virginia, 34 (ill.), 35 (map), 39
Swiss school of hill shading, 66
Terraces, underwater, 15, 94 (ill.)
Texas-Oklahoma boundary, 51 (ill.)
Thomas, H. H., 101
Thoroughfares, 34 (ill.), 35 (map), 39;
Eltham Marsh, 36 (ill.)
Tidal Basin, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Tidal deltas, 82 (ill.), 83 (ill.);
Barnegat Inlet, 84 (ill.), 85
Tidal inlet, Beach Haven, N. J., 85 (ill.)
Tidal marshes, stream development, 28 (ill.)
Tied island, 77 (ill.);
development—Napatree Point, Rhode Island, 92 (ill.)
Tombolos, 92 (ill.)
Topographic mapping, 72
Treasury Building, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Trees, 13 (ill.)
Tucker Beach, New Jersey, spit, 91 (ill.)
Underwater topography, 45;
best conditions for photographing, 47;
channel in Quantico Bay, 95 (ill.);
channels (natural) at Miami, Fla., 96 (ill.), 102;
channels, shoals, terraces—Roberts Creek, Virginia, 94 (ill.);
Chesapeake Bay, 90 (ill.)
United States Army Air Service, viii, xi, xii
United States Coast and Geodetic Survey, 74;
coast line charting, 87, 88;
Florida coast experiment, 93
United States Geological Survey, co-operation, xii
United States Land Office, 56
United States Military Academy, 8 (ill.)
United States Naval Academy, 7, 9 (ill.)
United States Naval Observatory, 13 (ill.)
United States Navy Air Service, viii, xi, xii
Vertical photographs, 1;
scale, viii, 74;
horizontal control, 74
Viewpoint, 1
Village, prototype, 54 (ill.)
Virginia, Eastern Shore mud-flat area, stream system, 41, 42 (ill.), 43 (ill.);
tidewater portion, 38
Visibility under water, 102
Volcanic craters. See Craters
Volmat, J., 99, 101
War and Navy offices, new, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Wards Island, 15 (ill.)
Warwick Creek and Mulberry Island, Virginia, 24 (ill.), 25 (map)
Washington, D. C., Capitol, frontispiece, 7;
Library of Congress, 7;
mapping, 79;
part showing White House, Treasury, and many familiar features, 16 (ill.);
topographic map, part, opp. 22;
United States Naval Observatory, 13 (ill.)
Washington Column, California, 60 (ill.)
Washington Monument, 16 (ill.)
Wash-overs, 81 (ill.), 86 (ill.)
Watch Hill, R. I., 92
Water, Visibility under, 102
West Point, N. Y., United States Military Academy at, 2, 8 (ill.)
West Point, Va., 36 (ill.), 38;
marshes, 29, 30 (ill.)
White House, Washington, D. C., 16 (ill.)
Wichita Falls, Tex., 51
Wildwood, N. J., 98
Wintun Glacier, 58 (ill.)
Wright, Orville, ix
Wright, Wilbur, ix
York River, 38, 76, 83, 87;
shoreline, 77 (ill.)
Yosemite and Mt. Lyell topographic sheets, 61
Yosemite Valley, 60 (ill.), 61 (map)

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Cf. his The Use of the Panoramic Camera in Topographic Surveying, With Notes on the Application of Photogrammetry to Aerial Surveys, U. S. Geol. Surrey Bull. 657, Washington, D. C., 1917.

[2] H. E. Ives: Airplane Photography, Philadelphia, 1920, pp. 328-350.

[3] The Pamunkey gets its name from a tribe of Indians famous in the early days of Virginian history but now reduced to a few families living on a reservation situated on the banks of the river near Lester Manor. Mattaponi is a combination name. The Mat and the Ta unite to form Matta Creek. The Matta and the Po unite, and Ny Creek is a tributary to the Po. The waters of these streams unite to form the river, and the names Mat, Ta, Po, and Ny unite to form its name—Mattaponi.

[4] A. H. Brooks, personal communication.

[5] Eric Mjöberg: A Proposed Aërial Expedition for the Exploration of the Unknown Interior of New Guinea, Geogr. Rev., Vol. 3, 1917, pp. 89-106.

[6] The Use of Aerial Photographs in Topographic Mapping: A Report of the Committee on Photographic Surveying of the Board of Surveys and Maps of the Federal Government, 1920, Air Service Information Circular (Aviation) No. 184, War Department, Washington, D. C., 1921.

[7] What can be done, however, by photographing obliquely from a high altitude, thereby increasing the area in the field of vision, is illustrated by Figure 54, which encompasses Lake Erie from one shore to the other and, in its representation of the main features of the region, is akin to maps on a relatively small scale, such as 1:1,000,000.

[8] J. W. Bagley: The Use of the Panoramic Camera in Topographic Surveying, With Notes on the Application of Photogrammetry to Aerial Surveys, U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 657, p. 84. “The scale of the photograph is given by the relation f/H, f being the focal length of the lens and H the height of the camera above ground.” (Ibid.)

[9] E. Lester Jones: The Aeroplane in Surveying and Mapping, Flying, June, 1919, pp. 438-441, 472, and 476.

[10] H. E. Ives: Airplane Photography, 1920, pp. 407-408.

[11] E. Lester Jones: Surveying From the Air, Science, Vol. 52, 1920 (Oct. 17), pp. 574-575, and Engineering News-Record, Dec. 16, 1920, pp. 1184-1186.

[12] E. Lester Jones, op. cit. (Science), p. 575.

[13] J. Volmat: Application de la photographie aérienne aux levés hydrographiques, Comptes Rendus de l’Acad. des Sci. [de Paris], Vol. 169, 1919, Oct. 27, pp. 717-718; idem: Rapport sur la mission photohydrographique de Brest (1919), Annales Hydrogr. (publ. by Service Hydrographique de la Marine, Paris), 3rd Series, 1919-20, pp. 191-220, with seven air photographs and corresponding sections from French coast charts.

[14] H. Hamshaw Thomas: Geographical Reconnaissance by Aeroplane Photography, With Special Reference to the Work Done on the Palestine Front, Geogr. Journ., Vol. 55, 1920, pp. 349-376; reference on p. 369.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FACE OF THE EARTH AS SEEN FROM THE AIR ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE

## THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

> This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

- • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
- • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
- • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
- • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.